Despite the efforts of the left to foment hatred resulting in attempts on his life



Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 41.0 / 56.0 | -15.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 45.1 / 53.1 | -8.0 |
![]() | GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +21 | 207 | 228 |
Despite the efforts of the left to foment hatred resulting in attempts on his life

First
LikeLike
Actually it is not the same thing.
The soldier made a risky bet that the raid would succeed. His inside info was only that the raid would occur.
Nancy’s bets are on a sure thing.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Republicans pounce?
LikeLike
Politico returns to their favorite playbook. Covering for Dems.
LikeLike
Words are deadly…Democrats in the media and Democrat politicians have been yelling Hitler and pedo for so long that I am not sure it even means anything to them anymore. But their followers take it seriously and think that they have to act to “save” us from Hilter,
Imagine if the roles were reversed, the year 2010, and Obama president.
LikeLike
“Nancy’s bets are on a sure thing”
I hate this woman’s politics as much as the rest of you, but is there any evidence of this? From what I’ve seen, she has stated that her accounts are managed by an advisor with full discretion. She makes no investment decisions, approves no trades beforehand, and has no involvement whatsoever in the accounts. The portfolio has done incredibly well, and the securities are well known companies, but I have also seen others hitting such returns in the past 40 years with these amazing bull market runs without any insider trading . Now it’s possible that she is secretly feeding the advisor with inside information, but there is no proof that I have seen where this has been substantiated or even alleged. There doesn’t seem to be any basis for a case here. Is there anything out there that I am missing?
LikeLike
President Trump endorses the idea of changing ICE to NICE
LikeLike
Is there anything out there that I am missing?”
Yeah, you are taking Nancy Pelosi at her word.
she has stated that her accounts are managed by an advisor with full discretion.She makes no investment decisions, approves no trades beforehand, and has no involvement whatsoever in the accounts.“
Anyone who believes anything Nancy Pelosi says is a full fledged moron.
The Pelosi household portfolio sits near $280 million, with returns since 1987 estimated around 17,000%. That cumulative gain dwarfs the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s roughly 2,300% over the same period and outpaces every benchmark Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has set during the same stretch.”
Nancy Pelosi is a smarter investor than Warren Buffet. Who knew?
LikeLike
the Wanker has an 18% approval rate.
LikeLike
Nancy Pelosi has a well-documented pattern of suspiciously timed stock trades that frequently coincide with major market-moving events she helped shape through her congressional role, raising strong suspicions of insider trading that would typically send an ordinary citizen to prison.
NVIDIA (2024-2025): Purchases of NVIDIA call options in 2024 occurred before massive surges in share price driven by AI demand, with significant sales taking place in late 2024 and early 2025. Google (2022-2023): Paul Pelosi sold 30,000 shares of Google (GOOGL) in December 2022, just one month before the Department of Justice announced an antitrust lawsuit against the company. Visa/Tech Antitrust (2025): Reports indicated substantial sales of Visa and Microsoft stock shortly before antitrust investigations or lawsuits were announced regarding these companies. AllianceBernstein (2026): In January 2026, over $1 million was invested in AllianceBernstein (AB) amid rumors of an acquisition, according to social media reports tracking her trades.Microsoft (2025): Sold 5,000 shares of Microsoft worth over $2 million months before a major antitrust investigation. Tesla and Chip Stocks: Purchased Tesla call options before news boosted the stock and traded in semiconductor stocks before Congress passed funding for that industry.
There are literally dozens of other examples of trades right before announcements of which Nancy Pelosi would have prior knowledge.
LikeLike
AIRO (AP) — Iran has offered to end its chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the U.S. lifting its blockade on the country and an end to the war, while proposing that discussions on the larger question of its nuclear program would come in a later phase, two regional officials said Monday.”
No.
The war was not about Hormuz, it was about Iran’s nuclear program and its ballistic missile capability.
Hopefully Trump will not agree to this.
LikeLike
Trump is a threat to the future of the Republic.
LikeLike
Future of the Republic of Iran, that is. 🙂
LikeLike
Maybe . However that would be a slam dunk case for the SEC and DOJ. Her statements are common defenses against such prosecutions and the fact that they haven’t filed any charges, tells me there’s more to it than her word. I know a number of senior officials at both agencies and they would be chomping at the bit to make such an easy case . In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if they haven’t already obtained the trading authorizations and other docs from her adviser as well as spoken to a few individuals at the firm, but that’s just speculation, of course 😉
LikeLike
The latest Iranian proposal is absolutely laughable.
Someone needs to tell them Obama and Biden and the rest of their appeasers aren’t in the WH any longer.
What a joke.
LikeLike
I don’t know why we don’t just take out all the loading docks on Kharg Island. I DO think the blockade was a master stroke since it avoided a messy casualty event of taking the island with the marines. Maybe Trump is avoiding taking out the docks because he feels the blockade will accomplish the same thing and is holding it in reserve.
LikeLike
What gets me is the American left’s alliance with Iran based on just the fact that they both hate Trump.
LikeLike
The Supreme Court handed down a victory for the Republican Party on Monday, striking down a lower court’s ruling that had blocked Texas’ plans for redrawing its congressional districts.
The court hung its order on reasoning from a previous ruling in Abbott v. League of United Latin American Citizens, but did not elaborate. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the decision.”
It will be interesting how these same justices vote on the VA and CA cases.
LikeLike
Leave a comment