Be the first to name the country or state shown below:
Map data ©2016 Google
Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 42.0 / 55.1 | -13.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 46.2 / 51.0 | -4.8 |
 | GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +3 | 216 | 219 |
Where is This?
Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 42.0 / 55.1 | -13.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 46.2 / 51.0 | -4.8 |
| GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +3 | 216 | 219 |
Be the first to name the country or state shown below:
Map data ©2016 Google
The Hedgehog Report - Phoenix Edition 
111 responses to “Where is This?”
Spain
LikeLike
Secretary Bessent: The culture of being able to come forward when you see wrongdoing is a central part of our democracy. I saw these two fellows before the President’s address to Congress in Speaker Johnson’s office. They came over to me and said, Sir, we’re still being harassed. I had been in touch with Senator Grassley about what was happening to them, but seeing them in person really brought it home for me.
I went and decided I would bring them into Treasury, give them a year to investigate the wrongdoing that’s going on at the IRS, and then they will go back in. Mr. Shapley will serve as the Senior Deputy for Investigation and Enforcement
Accountability returns to the US government.
LikeLike
not Spain
LikeLike
I forget the exact name, but it’s up in the Faroe Islands (north west of the Shetlands en route to Iceland).
LikeLike
GF is the Winner!
LikeLike
I need to go there. Amazing to see.
LikeLike
I thought Scotland at first, but then I saw the lake, the one that looks like it hovers over the ocean.
LikeLiked by 1 person
GF, you often recognize the places DW posts. Do you travel a lot?
LikeLike
The Navy sent GF on fun cruises for decades.
LikeLike
Jan – I releases your post on the last thread. If you post it again and it does not appear, let me know.
LikeLike
Jan, I sailed all across the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Grew up in the Middle East but travelled Europe and Africa as a child. Mother’s family is from South America. I get around, to say the least.
LikeLike
I get around, to say the least.
Hopefully not like Dondero and his underage prostitutes.
LikeLike
Walt travelled the world when it was just lava. He has very tough feet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Chief Justice Roberts rebukes Trump, saying impeachment isn’t ‘appropriate response’ to disagreeing with judge’s ruling”
I hope this ends the idea that Trump can impeach judges with whom he doesn’t agree with.
LikeLike
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said in a statement released by the Supreme Court. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Exactly.
LikeLike
Any polls yet on where Americans stand on the idea to give the Statue of Liberty back to the French?
LikeLike
I guess Roberts thinks Trump should file an appeal when he disagrees with a ruling. What a novel idea!
Chicon hardest hit.
LikeLike
Any polls yet on where Americans stand on the idea to give the Statue of Liberty back to the French?”
I am opposed because they might then ask for Louisiana.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Roberts should have also put the quietus on the idea that Trump can reverse Biden’s pardons.
LikeLike
Impeachment is appropriate as the judge sided with a terrorist group. I would pull the Judges security clearances asap.
LikeLike
BehizyTweets
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shouldn’t be issuing public responses to what the President of the United States says. Trump wasn’t even talking about him. It’s a very disrespectful thing to do.
·
6,628 Views
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha has said that his country can achieve a “long-lasting, just peace” under the leadership of U.S. President Donald Trump.
LikeLiked by 1 person
King Roberts has spoken!
Chicon
LikeLike
@mrddmia
In the last two weeks, a radical foreign national recently confirmed to the DC U.S. District Court illegally ordered the President of the United States to disperse $2 billion in foreign aid over his national-security review for terrorism and fraud. Emboldened by the Supreme Court’s complicity, another activist DC judge just held a Saturday hearing in which he intentionally exposed an ongoing national-security operation—and even illegally ordered the President to turn around planes full of the most dangerous terrorists in the Western Hemisphere to return them to American soil. These two orders are highly unlawful, extremely dangerous, and a radical judicial sabotage of the presidency. They crossed the red line. This a crucial test for the Chief Justice of the United States. When the federal judiciary loses its legitimacy, it loses everything.
·
43.6K Views
LikeLike
Impeachment is appropriate”
The Chief Justice disagrees with you.
Deal with it.
LikeLike
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shouldn’t be issuing public responses to what the President of the United States says.”
LOL
He actually just stated what is the appropriate course if you disagree with a judicial ruling.
“Disrespectful” my ass.
LikeLike
illegally ordered the President of the United States to disperse $2 billion in foreign aid over his national-security review for terrorism and fraud.”
BS.
He LEGALLY ordered the government to pay for work contracted and COMPLETED.
LikeLiked by 1 person
King Roberts has spoken!
Chicon”
Hmmmm…
I think a good argument could be made Trump is acting more like a King trying to impeach judges he doesn’t agree with vs. Roberts who is saying there is a correct process to follow when you disagree.
LikeLike
In the last two weeks, a radical foreign national”
Translation: because a US citizen was born in Canada the xenophobic morons call him a “foreign national”.
Actually, he is just as much an American as Tina.
LikeLike
“Roberts… is saying there is a correct process to follow when you disagree.”
What’s the process to expeditiously handle a systematic abuse of the system?
I know….wait a few years while “the process plays out”. In the meantime, don’t you dare deport a single member of a designated terrorist organization without having a single district court judge saying it is ok.
Lovely…..
Chicon
LikeLike
Trump has been impeached twice. And if the Democrats win back the House in the midterms you can bet they will try to impeach Trump again.
There have been 13 US District Court Judges that have been impeached and one Supreme Court Justice.
“What is good for the goose is good for the gander” as the old saying goes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John, HHR has a vocal section from the “Bend Over And Enjoy It” faction of the Republican Party. They are “concerned” the media and Democrats will be upset if the Republicans play as rough as the Democrats.
Chicon
LikeLiked by 1 person
Impeachment of judges is allowed. Roberts needs to deal with it.
The judge sided with a terrorist group without even allowing a gubment response,
He is suspect. Strip his security clearance now.
LikeLike
Souter 2.0 appointed Bosoberg to run the foreign court during the Russian hoax, Bosoberg is suspect.
LikeLike
How is it that such a high percentage of these nationwide TRO’s are granted by judges appointed by Obama and Biden? Coincidence probably.
My experience is that cases in federal system are to be randomly assigned to a judge.
Chicon
LikeLike
Plus, it’s trumps personal free speech rights (re impeaching judge bozo).
LikeLike
It ain’t random. It’s the same Marxist judges getting the cases.
LikeLike
Souter should have sat this one out.
@EricLDaugh
Why is Chief Justice John Roberts coming out against Trump for calling out the judge who tried to keep gang member illegals in the U.S.? Why does he sound like the is a Democratic politician?
·
4,931
LikeLike
Here is an article on Souter 2.0 and Bosoberg /FISA COURT.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/18/president-trump-goes-scorched-earth-on-judge-boasberg-chief-justice-john-roberts-defends-boasberg/
LikeLike
Strip the judge of his security clearance,
Launch criminal investigation into judge and fisa court.
LikeLike
Impeachment is not due to “disagreeing.” The judge is on the take of a foreign gubment.
LikeLike
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/boom-laura-loomer-uncovers-enormous-taxpayer-funded-conflict/
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz. Trump can call for impeaching Judges but Roberts can’t mention Trump. Got it.
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz
LikeLike
Please provide a 1 page summary of each of those cases. Thank you.
LikeLike
Cases are randomly assigned in courts unless there is only one judge. For example, a municipal court/small claims court.
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz
LikeLike
Where is the proof of that?
LikeLike
That is not a conflict of interest unless the Judge receives a financial benefit from his daughter’s views/employment.
LikeLike
No proof? No conflict. Having a radical family member is not a conflict of interest.
LikeLike
How is it that such a high percentage of these nationwide TRO’s are granted by judges appointed by Obama and Biden? Coincidence probably.”
Zzzz….
Deadenders like you wanted far left Senators because it SENT A MESSAGE to the RINOS, and they confirmed a lot of these judges.
Don’t whine now.
LikeLike
It is clear that Bitter is back!
Welcome back to the ranks of the cynics. I’m sure Jason missed you.
LikeLike
Why is Chief Justice John Roberts coming out against Trump for calling out the judge who tried to keep gang member illegals in the U.S.? Why does he sound like the is a Democratic politician?”
Zzzzz..
He came out against Trump calling for impeaching judges he doesn’t agree with, very different.
I actually think Trump can win on the merits of these deportations.
Of course, if he decides to piss off SCOTUS instead, maybe not.
LikeLike
“Roberts… is saying there is a correct process to follow when you disagree.”
What’s the process to expeditiously handle a systematic abuse of the system?”
There are emergency appeals.
LikeLike
Trump needs SCOTUS for a lot of his agenda.
But maybe he will do what he often does, shoot himself in the foot.
LikeLike
“The judge is on the take of a foreign gubment.”
Do you have any evidence of this or did you read it at Gateway Pundit?
LikeLike
If Trump shot himself in the foot in the middle of Fifth Avenue, would anybody say anything?
LikeLike
So far Tina has linked garbage conspiracy sites like Gateway Pundit and Conservative Treehouse.
Let’s see some real evidence the “judge is on the take from a foreign government”
LikeLike
I heard that Judge was given one of Zelensky’s yachts.
– Cult Member
LikeLike
LikeLike
Should a Qu’Chua speaking foreigner who somehow became an “American citizen” be allowed to talk about other foreigners who somehow became an “American citizen?”
C’mon, man.
LikeLike
Souter 2.0 can speak but this case may head hi way soon. Because he stupidly spoke now, what are the odds he will have to recuse himself later? He is Bosoberg bff
LikeLike
They shop these tros which are not appealable.
Souter and Beotchy could have stopped this but they failed.
LikeLike
Uh oh! It looks like Judge Chuang might have signed his order with an auto-pen.
LikeLike
However, it looks like this injunction is appealable. So, the next stop is the DC Circuit?
Or do we go right to the Supreme Court with an emergency appeal?
LikeLike
Pound sand.
LikeLike
The judge aligned with the gubment of Venezuela needs his security clearances pulled.
His order is useless ignore it for the reason below:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/335/160/
LikeLike
@seanmdav
If John Roberts is going to spend his time issuing impotent press releases against Trump, as if he’s an MSNBC host or a Democrat congressional candidate, instead of doing his actual job of protecting the rule of law from lawless inferior court judges, then he is going to end up doing far more damage to the Court than anything a lone politician is capable of. All of our problems with the judiciary right now stem from a refusal of judges to understand their actual roles in government. James Boasberg is not the president, and John Roberts is not a member of Congress. The sooner they are made to understand this, the better it will be—both for them and the country.
·
114.3K Views
LikeLike
@seanmdav
John Roberts can’t keep his own court’s clerks from illegally releasing decisions—an act that nearly led to the assassination of two of his own colleagues—but he’s going to lecture Trump on what he can and can’t post on Truth Social?
·
140.9K Views
LikeLike
I would never shake Trump’s hand. I would shake Robert’s hand. Both can be true.
Everybody saying to ignore a court’s order is no different than a Democrat.
LikeLike
https://www.statnews.com/2025/03/17/trump-cuts-columbia-university-nih-cancels-diabetes-prevention-program-study/
https://www.statnews.com/2025/03/17/trump-cuts-columbia-university-nih-cancels-diabetes-prevention-program-study/
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz. I have Type 1 diabetes. Anybody who wants to avoid Type 2 already knows how. Less sugar. More salad.
LikeLike
The Cult claim that it is an impeachable offense for a Judge to disagree with Trump.
Meanwhile, in the real word, the authors of the majority opinions of Dredd Scott and Roe, decisions that lead to the suffering and death of millions, were not impeached. They were just wrong. Eventually.
Let that sink in.
LikeLike
@BasedMikeLee
Impeachment is a non-justiciable political question assigned by the Constitution to Congress—one of the two political branches of the U.S. government—and not to the courts Frankly, I’m surprised that Chief Justice Roberts is publicly opining on such matters
LikeLike
No justification for Souter 2.0 to even opine on trumps free speech.
This is up to Congress.
LikeLike
Good talk on impeaching judges. But removing one ain’t gonna happen – it would need all Republicans, plus 14 Dems.
Changes in jurisdiction of District Court judges is also not going to pass Congress.
Of course, they can be investigated for any criminal wrongdoing. But only if a predicate exists….
Chicon
LikeLike
Trump trashes everybody. I respect and admire Roberts for telling him to F off.
LikeLike
Robert’s should have told Trump to STFU and stop whining like a little bitch.
LikeLike
That would’ve been very judicial…..
Chicon
LikeLike
Yup, trashes everyone = free speech.
The only support for Souter 2.0 is you and other Ds
LikeLike
It would have been well deserved. Trump is President. Not God.
LikeLike
Tina – I think that Judge’s Decision was wrong. It is not an impeachable offense.
Do you even remember your life before you joined the Cult?
LikeLike
Does Predictit have odds on whether the Oak Island gang will find something tonight?
LikeLike
Odds are very high they find something, Bitter. Odds are also very high that the thing they find will be uninteresting.
Chicon
LikeLike
Impeaching a federal judge requires 2/3 of the senate to convict.
The odds of that happening are less than Janzam renouncing her hero Putin.
So its just grandstanding and a huge waste of time.
But then the Cultists were never against grandstanding.
LikeLike
They might find something more significant than what is found in the JFK files.
LikeLike
Do you even remember your life before you joined the Cult?”
She probably doesn’t consider it a life.
Life requires purpose.
LikeLike
Impeachment is a non-justiciable political question assigned by the Constitution to Congress—one of the two political branches of the U.S. government—and not to the courts Frankly, I’m surprised that Chief Justice Roberts is publicly opining on such matters”
Zzzzz….. he forgets there is another branch that has say on whether what the other 2 branches do is constitutional or not.
LikeLike
Jason, the Judiciary’s only role in impeachment is for the Chief to preside at the trial. In other words, it has no role. Impeachment is a political process.
Chicon
LikeLike
the judge wanted the plane to turn around because he didn’t want to find a new supplier for his Fentanyl
LikeLike
Jason, the Judiciary’s only role in impeachment is for the Chief to preside at the trial. In other words, it has no role. Impeachment is a political process.”
Nobody, including Roberts, said you can’t try to impeach a judge.
Roberts, correctly, points out this is not the adequate process if you don’t agree with a decision.
But if you think the House should waste time and effort and political capital making a show of impeaching while knowing the Senate will never convict, be my guest.
The Dems did that with Trump twice. Just follow their lead, you have a great track record of doing just that.
LikeLike
Blockbuster news on Oak Island.
They are now trying to find MORE than one treasure.
According to this episode, there could be several treasures.
I personally think that not finding multiple treasures is much more interesting than not finding one treasure.
LikeLike
They also found several bricks. One could have been made in the 1600’s.
The treasure could have been deposited in the 1600s.
Only a moron can’t add 2 + 2.
LikeLike
eanmdav
Question for professional court watchers—is there any reason why the Supreme Court would refuse to disclose or publish a press release from the Chief Justice on its web page, choosing instead to send it to select media outlets? This seems to be a significant departure from standard practice. But then again, so is a Chief Justice ethically compromising himself and the court by offering a political diatribe on a topic over which he has no authority and related to a party in cases he is currently overseeing.
LikeLike
It is hard for me to understand why you folks don’t get this. The Chief Justice supervises EVERY federal judge in the country. Part of his job is to protect the court system.
If he wants to call out the President for being a douche bag and interfering with the court system, he has every right to do it. But, it is not an official act of the Supreme Court. It is a shot across the bow, warning the President to watch his step. As the leader of a coequal branch of the govrenment, he owes nothing to the President.
LikeLike
….and the President cannot tell the Chief Justice what to do – or how to do it.
LikeLike
BillW – Because the Trump Cult believes Trump is the government and must be obeyed.
LikeLike
My understanding is that the SCOTUS site publishes dockets and opinions.
LikeLike
Bitter – I’m not saying they should be able to book a course in Con Law, but I would think they could at least understand simple concepts like separation of powers.
LikeLike
And yes, the most useful parts of the SCOTUS web site are the ‘Opinions of the Court’, ‘Opinions Relating to Orders’, and ‘Orders of the Court’. None of them are appropriate places for an admonition given by Roberts regarding Trump.
There is a section for Press Releases, but Roberts did not issue his comments as a Press Release.
LikeLike
Bush had 55 senators have his Iraq wars hoax election, and he put Schumer’s choice for SCOTUS on there. Then he followed up by trying to putt Harriet Miers who was not only an unknown but also relatively old. Basically he was trolling.
LikeLike
Souter 2.0 was sheot in 2005 and he is sheot in 2025. Mute 43 really wrecked the r brand.
LikeLike
You have not been a Republican for years. Your opinion is a zzzzzzzzzz.
LikeLike
“Trump needs SCOTUS for a lot of his agenda.”
-Other than the birthright citizenship issue, what part of Trump’s agenda needs any approval from SCOTUS? Tax cuts? Cutting spending? Getting rid of the Dept of Education?
LikeLike
“None of them are appropriate places for an admonition given by Roberts regarding Trump.”
-Much more appropriate to give it to the mainstream media to release!
Are you kidding me?
LikeLike
“It is a shot across the bow, warning the President to watch his step. As the leader of a coequal branch of the govrenment, he owes nothing to the President.”
-You are all for the Chief Justice warning the President, simply because he doesn’t like the President’s style?
What is the check and balance that WE THE PEOPLE have against such behavior from this Chief Justice?
If THE PEOPLE don’t agree with the President and/or his party, that party has to stand up for the next election and be accountable.
You are in favor of such power from unaccountable judges?
Good to know.
LikeLike
https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1902133272173539418?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1902133272173539418%7Ctwgr%5Ee79ed3039ab50e2c537e68ae4e8a506f36b85b33%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Finstapundit.com%2F709328%2F
-This is what Roberts is defending.
This won’t end up well, for Roberts.
LikeLike
https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1902135776483115120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1902135776483115120%7Ctwgr%5Ee79ed3039ab50e2c537e68ae4e8a506f36b85b33%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Finstapundit.com%2F709328%2F
“The Supreme Court press office is still refusing to make John Roberts’ statement about Trump available to the media writ large or the general public.”
-You are in favor of this.
Roberts says “Full disclosure – GFY, plebes!”
Bend over and ask for another, jason, Bitterlaw and BillW.
LikeLike
Biden told the Supreme Court to pound sand with the college loans issue, Roberts said NOTHING.
But, President Trump writes something on a social website, Roberts needs to speak up.
Such bravery!
LikeLike
Judiciary is now in control of:
Immigration issues.
Payment systems.
Hiring for Executive Branch.
LikeLike
NT
LikeLike