Trump Job Approval

Pollsters wrong in 2024:42.0 / 55.1-13.0
Pollsters right in 2024:46.2 / 51.0-4.8

2026 House Forecast

GOPDEM
Democrats +3216219

2026 Senate Forecast

TXMEOHMIGANHNCMN
Gap+4.5+2.0+1.4+1.4+1.4+3.6+6.2
Count5051525347464544

Buy Greenland? Seriously? Discuss.

68 responses to “Buy Greenland? Seriously? Discuss.”

  1. no reason to buy Greenland unless someone knows it’s loaded with unknown gold mines.

    Like

  2. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Raw milk can make you sick. But if people want to risk illness, that is on them.”

    Zzzzz…

    “risk illness” what a load of BS.

    Anything can make you sick. The odds of being sick by raw milk are very low.

    Billions of people eat sushi, raw meat, raw oysters and clams, etc.

    Every supermarket has raw milk cheeses now.

    The campaign against raw milk is not based on any real science, it is based on just increasing government control.

    Like

  3. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    I fully support buying Greenland, it has a lot of resources and is strategically positioned.

    There were idiots against buying Louisiana territory and Alaska too.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    As the Arctic ice continues to melt due to global warming, Greenland’s mineral and energy resources – including iron ore, lead, zinc, diamonds, gold, rare earth elements, uranium and oil – are becoming more accessible”

    DW did touch on a good point, there IS plenty of gold in Greenland.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    I am glad this guy is an advisor to Trump, sounds like he is no xenophobic isolationist.

    https://hotair.com/stephen-moore/2025/01/05/trump-and-musk-are-right-legal-immigrants-a-boon-to-us-economy-n3798463

    Like

  6. except there is no reason to believe that ice is melting on Greenland. Several years ago researchers located an abandoned WWII plane that landed on Greenland’s ice, only they had to dig way down deep into the ice to get it out, given the huge growth of ice

    Like

  7. Like

  8. @mrddmia

    The Biden White House looks like the Star Wars bar today. With Biden handing out cheap tequila shots (Biden presidential medals) to the Trump-deranged losers.

    ·

    28.3K Views

    Like

  9. I have made no posts for or against obtaining Greenland. It does raise questions.

    Like

  10. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    This will make it harder for the Freedom (not) Caucus hostage taking morons to oust Johnson.

    “The rules package, which passed in a 215-209 vote, requires nine members of the majority party to co-sponsor a motion to vacate the speaker from the top leadership position, up from current rules that only require one. The change offers some breathing room for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) as he enters his first full term as speaker, especially after he faced initial opposition to secure the gavel earlier in the day. “

    Like

  11. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Some parts of Greenland seem to be melting, but in any case the technology to recover minerals should allow for more production even with the ice.

    Like

  12. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    There is no doubt some glaciers are retreating in Greenland. The causes and consequences are probably not what the eco-terrorists claim but I have seen film of several glaciers that have retreated several miles in the last 30 years. Now whether this has uncovered any ore deposits I don’t know.

    Like

  13. 1. What becomes of the Greenlanders? Are they granted immediate American citizenship/dual citizenship? Will it be like Puerto Rico with citizenship but not voting for President or having voting rights in Congress? When does the make Greenland a state movement begin?

    2. Will West Side story be updated to reflect 3 gangs – the Jets, the Sharks, and Polar Bears?

    Like

  14. cLDaugh

    JUST IN: Chuck Schumer proclaims Democrats lost the 2024 election because the American voters “didn’t realize how much we had done” for them.

    Rule number 1 in politics: Don’t blame the voters.

    Like

  15. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    There are only 56,000 Greenlanders. They could choose between US citizenship and Danish or keep both.

    Like

  16. Schumer was wrong, as the voters did realize how much “damage” the Dems had done for this country and it’s people.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Schumer must subscribe to the Bunu school of politics.

    If it wasn’t for those pesky voters, his candidates would always win.

    Like

  18. 6.2 earthquake just struck 30 miles or so from El Salvador.

    Like

  19. The reaction of the Not One Square Inch crowd will be interesting, if Big Z/Ukraine decides to cede territory in order to end the war.

    Chicon

    Like

  20. Like

  21. It will be a worse deal for the grifter than the deal blown up by the fat slob.

    Like

  22. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    There was no “deal”, only a demand that Ukraine surrender its sovereignty, rightfully rejected.

    Repeating the lie over and over might make Goebbels proud, but it’s still BS.

    Like

  23. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    The reaction of the Not One Square Inch crowd will be interesting”

    Can we have the name of anyone here who ever said Not One Square Inch?

    If not we will just credit you for the 2025 HHR Clown Contest.

    Like

  24. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    The “peace agreement” that was not for peace and not an agreement.

    “One of the many myths and legends surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine is the idea that Kyiv rejected a reasonable Russian peace deal in the early weeks of the war. In reality, recently obtained documents confirm that the terms offered by the Kremlin in spring 2022 would have left Ukraine partitioned, disarmed, internationally isolated, and utterly unable to defend itself against further Russian aggression. In other words, Vladimir Putin’s alleged peace proposal was in fact a call for unconditional surrender and a blueprint for the destruction of the Ukrainian state.

    Documents released this week by Radio Free Europe provide important new insights into the severity of the Kremlin’s demands when Russian and Ukrainian delegations sat down at the negotiating table in the first weeks of the war. As Putin’s armies swept across southern Ukraine and advanced on Kyiv, Russian officials listed their conditions to halt the invasion and implement a ceasefire. The resulting draft treaty spells out the unacceptable costs of what would have amounted to Ukraine’s capitulation.

    In terms of territorial concessions, Ukraine was expected to cede Crimea and the Donbas region outright, while also accepting the ongoing occupation of areas then under Russian control until Moscow deemed that its conditions had been fully met. Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.

    The most detailed and revealing segment of the draft peace treaty dealt with Ukraine’s demilitarization. Russia called for the Ukrainian army to be drastically reduced to a skeleton force of just fifty thousand personnel. This was approximately one-fifth of the prewar total and a tiny fraction of Ukraine’s current military, which is believed to number around one million soldiers. Meanwhile, tight restrictions were to be imposed on the quantity of armor Ukraine could possess, the types of missiles the country could develop, and the size of the Ukrainian Air Force.

    The Kremlin’s peace plan also obliged Ukraine to renounce its NATO membership ambitions and agree not to enter into bilateral alliances or seek military aid from Western countries. In later drafts dating from the final stages of the abortive peace process in April 2022, Russia also somewhat absurdly insisted on a veto over any international response to future attacks on Ukraine. If Ukraine’s leaders had accepted Moscow’s thinly veiled ultimatum, the country would have been disarmed and defenseless.”

    https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putins-2022-peace-proposal-was-a-blueprint-for-the-destruction-of-ukraine/

    Like

  25. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Had Ukraine and the West accepted those terms, Ukraine would have instantly been rendered defenseless and become a vassal state of Russia.

    Like

  26. I had as one of my 2025 predictions, that U.SD, gets Greenland.

    Like

  27. “Sonny” Smart, father of Georgia head coach Kirby Smart, dies in fall in New Orleans

    Sean Leahy

    January 4, 2025 at 11:10 AM

    *****************************

    ssq texted me.

    She sees a conspiracy here.

    If he died in the fall,. why are they just getting around to tell us now in the middle of winter.

    Like

  28. The Ukrainian people have been tired of the war for some time. Zelensky has also become less popular because of the war, and he is now looking at Trump’s “unpredictability” to end the war. Of course a wave of disappointment will erupt here for two guys, who only want what they want before any talk of ending the war is discussed.

    Like

  29. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Harry Sisson

    @harryjsisson

    Things have gotten WAY WORSE since Trump got elected!!!”

    LOL

    WHo is still President?

    Like

  30. Zzzzzzzz Ukraine has the right to fight as long as it can and it is in the strategic interest of the U.S. to aid it. As a sovereign nation, it will have to make its decision.

    The Putin supporters wanted Ukraine to surrender its sovereignty and become a puppet of Russia.

    Like

  31. Lies. Damn lies. More lies.

    Like

  32. Reading the alleged agreement terms offered years ago to resolving the Ukraine/Russian conflict quickly, how and what does Ukraine gain by waiting two years and doing it in 2025?

    Like

  33. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    The Ukrainian people have been tired of the war for some time.”

    I guess they are tired of having their people displaced, killed, tortured, maimed, kidnapped and exiled and their towns and cities bombed and their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure destroyed and their economy ruined.

    But Chicon, Tina, Janzam, and the rest of the Putinistas are still cheering their hero Putin on and making excuses for his war crimes.

    Like

  34. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    TReading the alleged agreement terms offered years ago to resolving the Ukraine/Russian conflict quickly, how and what does Ukraine gain by waiting two years and doing it in 2025?

    Zzzzz…

    Those will not be the terms, Ukraine will be MORE heavily armed, not less. European troops will be placed in Ukraine to ensure whatever new borders there will be. Ukraine will not be forced to disarm and will not surrender its sovereignty.

    Even more importantly, NONE of this will happen.

    Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.

    Like

  35. Jason says…..”I guess they are tired of having their people displaced, killed, tortured, maimed, kidnapped and exiled and their towns and cities bombed and their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure destroyed and their economy ruined.”

    Exactly.

    And, as a result, they may decide to cut the best deal they can. Then, you and Bitter will whine like tired three yeat olds about how it’s Trump’s fault.

    Chicon

    Like

  36. I think sacrificing tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, lives, wiping complete communities off the map, causing millions to flee their country and tearing apart families is the sad legacy of this unnecessary war. Putin is certainly the villain. But, those defiantly denying reality, seeing Ukraine winning back its original borders, are fools.

    Like

  37. Ukraine is still a sovereign nation. Next question.

    Like

  38. Zzzzzz It will be Putin’s fault.

    Like

  39. The war was only unnecessary for Russia. Once invaded, it was absolutely necessary for Ukraine to fight back.

    Like

  40. Jan – Should Ukraine have accepted the terms outlined by Radio Free Europe?

    Like

  41. Why privately? State it publicly, buffune

    REPORT: Senate Majority Leader John Thune privately confirms Pete Hegseth has the votes to be confirmed as Secretary of Defense – CBS

    Like

  42. Sad but true.

    “And, as a result, they may decide to cut the best deal they can. Then, you and Bitter will whine like tired three yeat olds about how it’s Trump’s fault.”

    Like

  43. Putina still believes there was a pre-war deal. Sad but true. Jason posted Putin’s surrender offer.

    Like

  44. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    If Trump doesn’t stand up for Ukraine’s sovereignty, it will be on him.

    But I have a feeling the Putinistas are going to be disappointed.

    Like

  45. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    of this unnecessary war.”

    The war was only unnecessary up to the point the Russians invaded.

    After that, it was entirely “necessary”.

    Like

  46. Jan – Should Ukraine have accepted the terms outlined by Radio Free Europe?

    Weighing the consequences of not signing it, I think the deal would have been better than what they will get now. Does anyone think Putin will negotiate better terms now, after losing so many men, than what he was willing to do before all the bloodshed?

    Like

  47. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Vance and Don Jr. are pro-Putin and of course have a lot of influence with Trump. But he has some advisors who have previously expressed support for Ukraine and Rubio himself as SOS is no isolationist. In fact, one of the reasons I supported him for President is that I do think he understands geopolitics and is supportive of our alliances and strategic interests.

    Maybe I am wrong, but I think Trump will play more hardball with Putin than the Putinistas hope for.

    Like

  48. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Weighing the consequences of not signing it, I think the deal would have been better than what they will get now”

    Geezus, you are one stupid Putin toady.

    The “deal”: was unilateral surrender by Ukraine, militarily and culturally too. It would have ended as a sovereign nation.

    The most detailed and revealing segment of the draft peace treaty dealt with Ukraine’s demilitarization. Russia called for the Ukrainian army to be drastically reduced to a skeleton force of just fifty thousand personnel. This was approximately one-fifth of the prewar total and a tiny fraction of Ukraine’s current military, which is believed to number around one million soldiers.

    Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.

    Ukraine’s leaders had accepted Moscow’s thinly veiled ultimatum, the country would have been disarmed and defenseless.

    You really agree Ukraine should have agreed to this?

    Like

  49. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    oes anyone think Putin will negotiate better terms now, after losing so many men, than what he was willing to do before all the bloodshed?”

    Of course he will.y

    He is not going to get ANY of that.

    Ukraine is not going to de-militarize, any deal now will involve strengthening Ukraine’s military and placing foreign troops to ensure Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

    And there is not going to be any “Russification” of Ukraine, quite to the contrary.

    Like

  50. The deal will be worse than the pre war one.

    The free passers will blame trump when the grifter signs the “new peace deal.”

    Like

  51. Gee how did they enter?

    House Intel Chair Mike Turner Confirms ISIS-Linked Terrorists Actively

    Like

  52. Tina said…..”The deal will be worse than the pre war one.

    The free passers will blame trump when the grifter signs the “new peace deal.”

    I think the first is not true, and the second is absolutely true (more so for Bitter than Jason).

    Trump will not allow what looks like a loss (to most people) on his record. He wants to say…”the invasion wouldn’t have happened if i was President, and I got a good deal once I returned”. I also think Pooty Poot and Big Z want an escape hatch, and Trump will provide it.

    Bitter will rail against the deal almost no matter what it entails; Jason will be considerably more realistic, imo.

    Chicon

    Liked by 1 person

  53. Like

  54. Fair enough about disagreeing with point 1 and agreeing (for the most part) on point 2

    Like

  55. (chicon)

    Like

  56. I remember when Chi supported Ukraine defending itself. Of course, the Cult demands obedience.

    Like

  57. There was never a deal. Tina will continue to lie. Both can be true.

    Like

  58. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Tina said…..”The deal will be worse than the pre war one.”

    I posted what that “deal” (it was not a deal, it was a demand) entailed, but Tina the Putinista pretends that a pending agreement would be “worse than that”.

    You can’t really deal with that kind of ignorance.

    Like

  59. I guess Tina thinks that allowing Putin to decide the size of Ukraine’s military and Ukrainian children being instructed only in Russia was a deal.

    Like

  60. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Bitter will rail against the deal almost no matter what it entails; Jason will be considerably more realistic, imo.”

    Bitter and I have a few disagreements on Ukraine, he thinks Putin would have invaded even if Trump won in 2020, I would bet big $$$ against it. He is also more pessimistic than I am on how bad Trump’s proposal to end the war will be.

    But I think we are in agreement that in a just and fair world, the US would provide whatever aid was required for Ukraine to expel the Russians, make the Russians pay reparations, and bring to justice the war criminals.

    Anything less that that is morally wrong.

    I am only a “realist” about it because it is not a just a fair world.

    Like

  61. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    I have a feeling that since Tina is a compulsive liar she will say any deal that is reached “is worse” than her imaginary deal.

    Like

  62. Like

  63. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    Tom Tradup at Townhall demolishes hostage taking moron Thomas Massie…ouch.

    “First up at bat on Friday was the comical U.S. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) who clearly has no future with California Psychics.com (the website that boasts it turns down 98% of the psychics who apply for work because of their dubious ability to make accurate predictions.) 

    Massie—the linear equivalent of Mayberry deputy Barney Fife, who was only issued one bullet on the 1960 TV series “The Andy Griffith Show”—apparently believed he was going to derail U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson’s re-election to a second term as Speaker on the worst domino-theory since the Vietnam War. The Kentucky firebrand—quite likely the biggest blowhard in Congress since former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh—seemed to believe something like this: “If I bellow that I won’t vote for Mike Johnson even if they (?) shove bamboo splints under my fingernails, others will fall in line and join me in my personal vendetta against the Speaker.”  

    Before the vote took place, Massie must have been watching old films of The Three Stooges, like to one where their Army sergeant asks his troops for three volunteers to take on a dangerous assignment; everyone else takes a few steps back…and Curly, Larry and Moe are left to face the music. (I’m not comparing the brief “dissent” on Friday to the Stooges…particularly because Moe sports a snappier haircut that Thomas Massie.”

    Like

  64. jasonyupanqui47 Avatar

    particularly because Moe sports a snappier haircut that Thomas Massie”

    Damm….

    Like

  65. Tina and Jan probably think Hitler offered Poland a deal, too.

    Like

  66. Breaking: Fidel Castros son will resign as Canadian Pm.

    Like