Close race, but its a GOP pollster, Guidant Polling, 12/9-12/11 against likely voters:
 | NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| Sununu | 44 |
| Pappas | 47 |
- Greenland: New US Territory?
- Another NH Senate Poll
- Dem Leads NH Senate Race
- USA’s Gift to the People of Venezuela
- Weekend Thread
Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 42.0 / 54.9 | -12.9 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 46.3 / 50.3 | -4.0 |
 | GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +3 | 216 | 219 |
Another NH Senate Poll
90 responses to “Another NH Senate Poll”
-
First
LikeLike
-
The cat has no interest in going outside. I thought cats dream of creating an outdoor empire.
LikeLike
-
Nick Shirley suggested that soon to be unemployed Tim Walz could find work at the Quality Learing Center.
LikeLike
-
Sad news about Doug LaMalfa. He was one of the good ones.
Just out this morning, the latest Services PMI, which fell to a lower than expected 52.5 from last month’s 54.1. Here are a couple of quotes from the summary I saw:
“New business growth dropped to its lowest in 20 months, with panelists noting higher uncertainty in market demand and lower consumer spending, citing tariffs as a key source of instability.”
“Meanwhile, input price inflation rose to a seven-month high due to tariffs and broad increases in supplier charges, magnifying the increase in labor expenses.”
Hmm…..
LikeLike
-
The cat has no interest in going outside.”
The cat wants to go outside, and does so under strict supervision.
We are not convinced it is smart enough to deal with coyotes, foxes, eagles.
LikeLike
-
LaMalfa’s death puts all Republican congressional members at risk of assassination. Its now a margin too close for the violent radical left to resist the temptation.
LikeLike
-
I thought tariffs had no impact on prices, spending, investments, etc.
Someone remove FLA2025 from consideration for the Nobel prize for his novel theory.
LikeLike
-
They need a quick election for the MTG seat, what is the holdup on that? The governor, SOS and legislature is Republican
LikeLike
-
Maybe they are waiting for Trump to endorse somebody he can trash as soon as they are elected.
LikeLike
-
NEW: Records show US Capitol Police Capt. Michael Byrd, who fatally shot unarmed J6 protester Ashli Babbitt w/o warning, has been running an unaccredited day-care center w/ wife Kaleska from their MD. home since 2008.”
LikeLike
-
I am thinking of opening a day care center, but not sure the Amish would be interested.
I can think of several drawbacks, too, I would probably have to store my guns.
LikeLike
-
KAROLINE LEAVITT TRUTH NUKE: “Minnesota, a state once known as the Land of 10,000 Lakes, as been turned into the Land of 10,000 Somali SCHEMES because of their governor!”
LikeLike
-
the land of 10,000 Somali pirate schemes*
LikeLike
-
Also Lupita is not fond of children, she will kick at any that get too close. Since she does the same for just about any animal, maybe she thinks they are not people.
Could be a liability issue.
LikeLike
-
I did not realize that Byrd was pardoned by Demented or the auto pen.
He should be charged with murder.
LikeLike
-
LikeLike
-
Headline: Mamdani’s Democratic Socialists Demand Release of Maduro, His Return to Power
At least they are honest about the fact that they want to destroy our country and finish it’s transformation into a communist dictatorship.
LikeLike
-
R house control is looking very thin. Like I said, it would have been better if mtg just served her complete term.
it’s simple math, but a free passer does not understand it.
LikeLike
-
Maybe Trump should have not gotten into a hissy fit with crazy MTG. But a Cult Member would not understand it.
LikeLike
-
Oof: Tim Walz will go down in history as little more than an avatar of White guilt — the weak, apologetic eunuch of a White guy that progressives would have all of our sons become. But today, our sons can clearly see that the real lesson is: “Don’t be that guy.”
LikeLike
-
LikeLike
-
85% is not that stellar, means one in 6 Rs don’t approve of him. But the fact it is not deteriorating further is a good sign.
LikeLike
-
As far as I know, there is no reason an election cannot be quickly called in GA to replace MTG.
As far as Tina’s contention that it would have been better had MTG stayed, no.
She could have been a thorn in Johnson’s side, and could have tried to dump him by getting a couple other Rs like Roy and Massie to call for a vote. And she might have voted with the Dems on things like a War Powers act.
Better she is gone.
LikeLike
-
LikeLike
-
Erica the red is now more concerned with vaccines
LikeLike
-
Erick the Red became Erick the Blue, woke tone blue.
LikeLike
-
Speaking of Erics…
Oct 2024. Eric Holder explains that his vetting of Tim Walz for Kamala’s VP didn’t miss “anything of substance.” “Authentic guy with a great record.”
LikeLike
-
Leftists holding their cardboard “Free Maduro” signs in Times Square think they know more than the countries of South and Central America:
(Net Approval of capture and removal of Maduro)
🇨🇷 Costa Rica: (+80)
🇨🇴 Colombia (+67)
🇵🇪 Peru (+63)
🇨🇱 Chile (+62)
🇵🇦 Panama (+59)
🇦🇷 Argentina (+30)
🇪🇨 Ecuador (+24)
🇺🇾 Uruguay (+19)
🇲🇽 Mexico (+1)Altica Survey poll | 1/3-4
LikeLike
-
@SenFettermanPA defended President Trump amid criticism over the capture of Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro. “I don’t know why we can’t just acknowledge that it’s been a good thing what’s happened.”
LikeLike
-
We know why. TDS.
LikeLike
-
Why no TDS in all those Latin American countries? If the Dems continue to defend Maduro like this, they will risk further erosion in the Latino vote this fall.
LikeLike
-
Only 63% for Peru? Peruvians are just not to be trusted.
LikeLike
-
-
Walt is trying to outclass Hercules in the chores department.
LikeLike
-
125 attorneys in SDNY — out of maybe 500? — and 400 across DOJ, the ranks of which are already reduced by resignations and terminations it is working hard to fill, are now spending much of their time reviewing nearly 2 million separate documents as part of the “Epstein File” for purposes of releasing them. This process will take months if not years.
There simply aren’t enough sets of eyes to comply with Massie’s stupid bill. This could have been explained to anyone who took the time to inquire. Each document has to be read individually, redacted if necessary, and then reviewed to make sure the redactions conform to the statute and orders of the Court re victim privacy interests.
Those complaining about the “deadline” having passed can continue all you want — there is not alternative process that is going to get it done faster. But you have accomplished one goal of the Democrats — about 5% of all DOJ attorneys are tied up doing something other than advancing Pres. Trump’s policies.
·
68.9K Views
LikeLike
-
Re: The USA’s gift to the people of Venezuela.
I flew back into Miami international airport Monday night. As usual, there was an accident on the main highway (836) so my driver got me home taking a local route. On the drive, I was surprised to see so many people waving Venezuelan flags and holding up signs celebrating Maduro’s capture. I didn’t realize how many Venezuelan’s were down here However, what really stuck out was that about 1/3 of the signs, written mostly in Spanish, were thanking Trump specifically. Contrary to what I’ve been watching on CNN, this is not an unpopular move, at least down here. To the extent these people vote, this is a good thing.
LikeLike
-
Jason wrote –
I thought tariffs had no impact on prices, spending, investments, etc.
Someone remove FLA2025 from consideration for the Nobel prize for his novel theory
———-
Huh? I guess I’m living rent free in Jason’s head. Ok, I’ll play. Once again Jason misrepresents and mischaracterizes what someone posted on this blog and then falsely attacks with his mischaracterization. I never said that tariffs have had “no impact on prices”., just that in the aggregate (big word that Jason doesn’t seem to understand) at the time of my posts, the impact on prices was not material (again, in the aggregate). The internet is forever, my junior wannabe economist friend Jason . Go back and find the statement you are referencing and post it here in its entirety if you think otherwise. Ironically, you know who else said almost exactly what I said,? This guy below. Feel free to mischaracterize and misstate his statement as well, –
LikeLike
-
Let’s re-engage in this inflation discussion after the December CPI comes out one week from today. Forecasts have it at 0.3% for the month, 2.6% year-on-year – stubbornly above the 2% target, and nowhere close to stable prices.
LikeLike
-
I never said that tariffs have had “no impact on prices”.,
LOL
Sure you did. You said the costs would not be passed on to consumers and would be “eaten”, in other words, zero impact
That implies you think that higher costs on producers, exporters, wholesalers and retailers and the impact higher costs have on the whole supply chain is non-existent. You think higher costs don’t affect prices, profits, investments, etc.
Like you said, the Internet is forever.
You basically came up with an entire new theory where the basic laws of economics and supply and demand no longer apply.
As such, you cemented your legacy here as a complete imbecilic moron.
Own it.
LikeLike
-
Michael Reagan dead at 80.
LikeLike
-
Tucker Carlson thinks the US deposed Maduro in order to implement gay marriage in Venezuela.
LikeLike
-
-
We have a Star, a Reagan and an Elvis.
LikeLike
-
My list of candidates is in moderation.
LikeLike
-
Hello, I’m back. I hate everyone.
LikeLike
-
-
The Fucker Trump said disgusting things about Walz
LikeLike
-
You left?
LikeLike
-
Still no meds, Paul?
LikeLike
-
-
-
Jason wrote – Sure you did. You said the costs would not be passed on to consumers and would be “eaten”, in other words, zero impact
——-
You’re a total retard that must be smoking the Aztec mushrooms again. I said exactly what Powell said – that in the aggregate, the consumer prices were not materially impacted by the tariffs and provided you data to support it – just like Powell said. I’m sorry you’re too stupid to understand the English language as we all know it. Ironically, you were the moron that repeatedly said tariffs always increase consumer prices by the amount of the tariff , which as Powell noted is flat out wrong, but what can HHR phoenix expect from its junior wannabe economist, Jason. You also insisted that taririffs were never “eaten” and always passed on., which is equally retarded and factually inaccurate. Again, I challenge you to go back and read what I wrote and post it here in its entirety if I said anything other than what I am saying now. .
No new laws, my economically illiterate friend, just what this guy says –it’s the middle group, retailers and importers, THEY’RE NOT passing along to consumers that much of the cost. The actual impacts on inflation have been quite modest so far. It’s a small amount.”
LikeLike
-
The Ccp are likely even more upset about their “air defense” that failed.
disclosetv
·
28m
NEW – China strongly condemns the U.S. for “illegally redirecting” Venezuelan oil exports to Washington.
LikeLike
-
What tariffs actually lasted for more than a few days before Trump backed down? Asking for a friend.
LikeLike
-
LikeLike
-
The oil tanker left VZ. Supposedly broke our naval blockade.
LikeLike
-
Bitter wrote -What tariffs actually lasted for more than a few days before Trump backed down? Asking for a friend.
————
Bitter, tell your dumbass friend to do a quick search for the numerous and material amounts of tariffs that are still in effect, lasting more than “a few days” –
Last reported full month of tariff revenue was almost $30 billion, for a total of $246 billion collected to date. Tariffs in effect as of late 2025 include a 50% rate on steel, aluminum, and copper under Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act, as well as a 25% tariff on imported automobiles from most countries and specific per country tariffs. Although the so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs—some as high as 50%—were partially rolled back, to an average effective tariff rate remained around 14–16% for each country by December 2025 due to negotiated trade deals and exemptions for certain goods like semiconductors and food products.
LikeLike
-
What tariffs actually lasted for more than a few days before Trump backed down? Asking for a friend”
According to Tina, the tariffs were a genius move by Trump.
According to Tina, backing down on the tariffs was a a genius move by Trump.
LikeLike
-
egotiated trade deals and exemptions”
LOL
The ex-Nobel Prize candidate means backing down and eating crow on just about all the food products and most of the other tariffs too.
LikeLike
-
for a total of $246 billion collected to date”
Zzzzz…..
How much did it cost US companies and consumers “to date”?
How much less tax revenue was collected along the supply chain due to higher costs, lower volume, and fewer investments.
FLA2025 is a certified moron and AFL-CIO “conservative” who hates international trade and thinks the US is an economic island.
Now he is upset his novel economic theory that higher costs have no impact whatsoever on any component of the production/supply chain is revealed to be what it really is: stupid.
LikeLike
-
LOL! Jason is just too stupid read and understand that the tariffs remain between 14-16% per country on average AFTEF negotiation. I guess English is not his forte. The tariffs are materially still in effect (14-16% on average). However, I hear that there may be an exemption for impoverished llama farmers
LikeLike
-
As an attorney, I do not believe that the best way to get people to stop talking about you is to sue somebody for talking about you. I also do not believe that saying a man is large in that area is going to meet the standards of defamation or slander.
LikeLike
-
This happened all across the board, not just for Brazil.
“U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday removed his 40% tariffs on Brazilian food products, including beef, coffee, cocoa and fruits that were imposed in July to punish Brazil over the prosecution of its former president, Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro.
The move follows a similar order by the administration last Friday to remove tariffs on several agricultural products from other countries as the White House makes a U-turn on some tariffs that have increased the cost of food in the United States.
The order will affect Brazilian imports to the U.S. on or after November 13 and may require a refund of the duties collected on those goods while the tariffs were still being charged, according to the text of the order released by the White House.
Brazil normally supplies a third of the coffee used in the United States, the world’s largest coffee drinker, and has more recently become an important supplier of beef, particularly the type that is used to make burgers.
U.S. retail coffee prices rose as much as 40% this year due to the tariffs and other market factors such as weather-induced production shortfalls.”
LikeLike
-
between 14-16% per country on average”
Zzzzz…
What happened to the 100%, 50%, 40% tariffs you were so excited about when you thought they were the greatest thing since Jesus Christ and would surely kill international trade,
Oh wait, they were a “negotiating tactic”.
I am sorry you are so disappointed the US continues to trade internationally, better luck with Vance maybe.
LikeLike
-
lol! “Now he is upset his novel economic theory that higher costs have no impact whatsoever on any component of the production/supply chain”
———-
Jason’s smoking his Aztec mushrooms again, mistaking posts to deflect from the fact that even Jerome Powel said what I wrote. – .the importers and retailers have eaten most of the tariffs and have not passed them on to consumers as of yet and the impact on i consumer price inflation has been immaterial. He’s too stupid to understand the English language as we all know it.
Lol! Jason thinks what Powell said is a “novel economic theory”,! What a moron!
LikeLike
-
FLA2025 in 2024:
100%, 200%, 50% and 40% tariffs are a genius move, they will be “eaten” and have no effect on production, demand, profits, investments, or prices. This is absolutely genius.
FLA2025 in 2025:
Some 14% tariffs “remain”, this is absolutely genius.
LikeLike
-
the importers and retailers have eaten most of the tariffs”
So the reason Trump backed down on just about all of them, mostly unilaterally such as with Brazil, is because they were having no effect on prices?
“The move follows a similar order by the administration last Friday to remove tariffs on several agricultural products from other countries as the White House makes a U-turn on some tariffs that have increased the cost of food in the United States.
The order will affect Brazilian imports to the U.S. on or after November 13 and may require a refund of the duties collected on those goods while the tariffs were still being charged, according to the text of the order released by the White House.
Brazil normally supplies a third of the coffee used in the United States, the world’s largest coffee drinker, and has more recently become an important supplier of beef, particularly the type that is used to make burgers.
U.S. retail coffee prices rose as much as 40% this year due to the tariffs and other market factors such as weather-induced production shortfa
LikeLike
-
lol! FLA2025 in 2024:
100%, 200%, 50% and 40% tariffs are a genius move, they will be “eaten” and have no effect on production, demand, profits, investments, or prices. This is absolutely genius.
———-
Never said that. But hey, I get that Jason has a limited understanding of the English language and misinterpreted what I wrote.
You’re just a bullshitter, Jason. Once again, go back and copy and paste what I wrote here in its entirety. It’s not my fault your lack the ability to comprehend the English language or that you disagree with what Powell said. You’re a moron, I get it.
LikeLike
-
the importers and retailers have eaten most of the tariffs”
According to FLA2025, higher costs on importers and retailers have zero impact.
It doesn’t affect prices, profit margins, demand, investments, the higher costs magically are melted into cyberspace.
Certified imbecilic moron is too generous.
LikeLike
-
Jason is an Inca, not an Aztec.
LikeLike
-
So the reason Trump backed down on just about all of them, mostly unilaterally such as with Brazil, is because they were having no effect on prices?
——
only in the illiterate world of Jason is $30 billion a month and 14-16% on average tariff rates per country backing down and only someone who is a failed businessman can’t see that the initially high tariffs were used at times as a negotiating tool for better trade deals. But hey, what can you expect from our wannabe economist, Jason
LikeLike
-
Update on the cat. She has allowed me to pet and feed her. She might be angry at my daughter for taking her to the vet. It may only be temporary.
LikeLike
-
Never said that.”
LOL
Certified imbecilic moron AND pathological liar.
The reason Trump had to back down on most of the tariffs, especially food, was exactly because they were either causing higher prices or would do so in the near future.
You were excited about 100% tariffs on everything because you thought it would kill your hated international trade.
But you are too much of a lying fraud to admit that higher costs DO impact prices, profits, demand, investments, tax revenues and now you are left with “buhhhh hey, there are still some 14% tariffs, what a tremendous win against free/international trade”.
Idiot.
LikeLike
-
-
initially high tariffs were used at times as a negotiating tool”
LOL
Start out at 200% on everything, settle on 14% on some things.
Heck of a “negotiation”.
LikeLike
-
new thread
LikeLike
-
Again, Jason my illiterate friend, go find and post what I wrote. You are lying and misstating what I wrote. You’re also disagreeing with Jerome Powell, but you’re just too stupid to understand that. I posted his speech and quoted it for you. LOL! He said on video The tariffs are being eaten by middlemen and retailers and are not materially affecting consumer prices . You are a moron , LOl! .
LikeLike
-
So 7 days into the new year, we get the following from the freepassers:
What is the Monroe doctrine?
Who is Noriega?
There are no tariffs trump backed down. (Hmm maybe the Sc will no longer have to issue an opinion, which is rumored to be coming out this Friday?)
LikeLike
-
Of course FLA2025 thinks even 14% has zero impact on prices, demand, profits, investments, etc.
So his stupidity does not depend on the percentages, it is baked into his low IQ.
LikeLike
-
-
Blah blah blah, Jason . It’s what Powell said you retard, LOl!
LikeLike
-
You’re also disagreeing with Jerome Powell,”
Be careful in your fawning over Jerome Powell, your fellow international trade hater Tina doesn’t like him.
Let’s not have any dissension in the “AFL-CIO conservative” ranks.
LikeLike
-
-
Jason wrote – How about ALL of them
Except steel aluminum automobiles copper and imposing on average over 14-16 tariffs on every nation. Other than that, not a bad play, Mrs Lincoln, LOl! What a moron this Jason guy is!
LikeLike
-
I have to work, I am not a blood sucking parasite like FLA2025.
But now Tina is here, she is also a diehard protectionist who will support your war on free trade, free markets, and international trade, and she will agree with you that Trump’s tariffs are the greatest thing since the invention of the wheel.
Have fun.
LikeLike
-
Wow, what a WIN over free markets and international trade, 14% tariffs.
I am sorry that will not destroy international trade, but it was worth the college try, huh?
Better luck with 200% next time.
LikeLike
-
LOl! Blood sucking parasite! Yeah, me and Jerome Powell for just stating the fact that the tariffs have been eaten by middlemen and not materially affected aggregate consumer prices. Too funny!
LikeLike
The Hedgehog Report - Phoenix Edition 
Leave a comment