Be the first to name the state or country shown below. One guess per person, no using google lens or other such tools.
Map data ©2025 Google
Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 42.0 / 55.1 | -13.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 46.2 / 51.0 | -4.8 |
 | GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +3 | 216 | 219 |
Where is This?
The Hedgehog Report - Phoenix Edition 
116 responses to “Where is This?”
Uzbekistan.
LikeLike
I failed. When Bitter said last time that eventually it would be Uzbekistan, I took it that he was ripe for changing to something else if I put up a picture that didn’t particularly look like Uzbekistan.
But Uzbekistan it is! Well played.
LikeLike
@amuse
@amuse
LAWFARE: Democrat judge blocks NYC Mayor Adams from cooperating with ICE to remove TdA and MS-13 terrorists from Rikers Island and other New York City jails. Judge Mary Rosado worried the cooperation would open the floodgates for mass deportations at the city’s jails.
************
Just another honest judge calling balls and strikes. Definitely NOT legislating from the bench. File an appeal……
Chicon
LikeLike
BillW swore that the lawfare would end within days or weeks, not months or years. Maybe three months is still weeks to Ol’ Bill.
Chicon
LikeLike
And “judge” Amy Obama Berman is at it again, She was slapped down once, Now, she wants to micromanage the administration doing a RIF.
https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1914365007254700359?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
LikeLike
And we have commentary on the major fail by Souter 2.0 over the weekend:
@shipwreckedcrew
The ACLU’s brief is a PERFECT example of how the benign neglect of the appellate level courts — fecklessness — has created an expectation by “favored” litigants that phone calls and emails directly to judges can lay the foundation for, and even substitute when necessary, legal pleadings that make all the necessary factual and legal arguments that justify relief. “Judge, what’s happening might be so terrible that you must step in now and put a stop to it.
We don’t have all the details, but the worst-case scenario is so unimaginably intolerable that waiting simply isn’t an option.” THAT is modern day progressive liberal legal practice — which is accepted by progressive liberal judges as allowable.
·
55.3K Views
LikeLike
DW, “failed” seems a bit harsh, imo.
Chicon
LikeLike
Yessssssss!
LikeLike
Chicon wrote on February 12th: “Cases often take years to get to the Supreme Court.”
Remind me again when we get to years after Trump’s actions. It seems to me that a couple of Trump’s cases have already been to the Supreme Court. It took only a matter of days.
LikeLike
DW, the Zoom market and Royal Theater (taken from visual cues in the photo) are also in Tashkent, a simple Google search revealed (not Lens! Actual Google). I chuckled when I saw BL’s “Uzbekistan.”
LikeLike
*Zoon market
LikeLike
Sean Davis
@seanmdav
We know more about Pete Hegseth’s Signal chats than we do two of Trump’s would-be assassins.
***********
According to some here, this is no big deal since the government is pure and good.
Chicon
LikeLike
Conservative Brief
@ConservBrief
HAHAHAHA! Democrat Rep. Maxwell Frost reveals that the delegation sent to El Salvador to ‘liberate’ illegal alien and gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia have been DENIED access – because they are not there in an “official capacity” due to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer denying the Democrats access to use taxpayer funds for these trips.
LikeLike
Here’s a follow-up on dem pilgrimages to El Salvador- it’s about time!
Rep. James Comer
@RepJamesComer
·
Follow
If Democrats wish to travel to El Salvador and meet with a foreign illegal MS-13 gang member, they can spend their own money to do so. I will not approve a single dime of Oversight Committee taxpayer funds for use on the excursion Democrats have requested.
LikeLike
Another Biden mistake remedied:
“American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for irresponsible student loan policies,” Secretary of Education Linda McMahon wrote in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal on Monday.
The Department of Education will begin collecting payments on defaulted student loans on May 5.
The new policy will impact an estimated 5 million borrowers who have not made any monthly payments since March 2020.
Federal student loan payments were halted in March 2020 because of the Covid pandemic. Payments were set to resume in October 2023, but millions of borrowers are still in default.
LikeLike
Logan Act those officials.
LikeLike
Hilarious ad
https://x.com/NRSC/status/1914428145152791015?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1914428145152791015%7Ctwgr%5E74ebfb6199355686bde507b1fd31952e3b7c8ab0%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fbobhoge%2F2025%2F04%2F21%2Fwatch-senate-republicans-release-brutal-new-ad-mocking-ms-13-ms-13-loving-dems-visiting-el-salvador-n2188128
LikeLike
There is a new standard for Presidential mental acuity in America.
Standing up!
“Fragoso: “You did not see any decline from 2024 Joe Biden to 2021 Joe Biden?”
Warren: “Not when I said that. You know, the thing is, he… look, he was sharp. He was on his feet.”
LikeLike
Stand Up Chuck!
LikeLike
Just watched this week’s episode of The Last of Us. Wow.
LikeLike
According to some here, this is no big deal since the government is pure and good.”
Looks like Chicon wants to compete with Tina on who comes up with the most idiotic “things nobody ever said at HHR”.
LikeLike
No justice, no peace. Unreal –
LikeLike
@shipwreckedcrew
I am amused by spotting bad lawyering: Example — in the ACLU filing today responding to the Govt seeking to have SCOTUS vacate its stay of Tren de Aragua deportations, the ACLU writes: “Despite its bare assertion that it gave putative class members “adequate” notice, the government does not contest the startling list of deficiencies Applicants identified.
It does not deny that it gave notices written in English even though putative class members largely speak only Spanish.” The Govt asserted that the Notice was read to the detainees in Spanish.
Question — does the ACLU suggestion mean they have confirmed that all members of the putative class “read” Spanish? If not, how is a Spanish version of the notice more effective than an English version translated orally?
·
7,867 Views
LikeLike
Alternate universe:
Joan Walsh
“On Sunday, Senator Chris Van Hollen conquered all five morning talk shows. He was by far the most coveted guest after his return from El Salvador, where he stood down the country’s despot and secured a meeting with the illegally deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Van Hollen delivered love from Abrego Garcia’s family and his growing legion of advocates and proved that the 29-year-old father is alive and safe—at least for now”
LikeLike
I hope when it comes my turn to be deported they give me written and oral notices in Quechua.
LikeLike
Is it bad lawyering if SCOTUS gave the ACLU what it requested?
LikeLike
Yes, if it was good lawyering SCOTUS would have understood they should deny it.
LikeLike
Here’s an interesting bit of history –
Excerpt –
“The men had buried their German uniforms on the beaches, and were wearing civilian clothes and carrying a lot of greenbacks when apprehended. Since they had not actually done anything, under civilian law, smart lawyers could get them off with just a couple of years in prison for violating immigration laws, spitting on the sidewalk, and picking their feet in Poughkeepsie. Further, there was a Supreme Court precedent from the Civil War era to deal with, Ex Parte Milligan(1866), in which a Confederate sympathizer and propagandist in Indiana had had his conspiracy conviction by a military tribunal overturned on the grounds that federal courts were still operating at the time of his arrest, and that’s where he should have been tried.
From Roosevelt’s point of view, however, habeas was a luxury the country couldn’t afford; Lincoln had felt the same way during his time as commander-in-chief. Pearl Harbor was, after all, only six months in the rear-view mirror and while the Battle of Midway had just sent the Japanese carrier fleet to the bottom, the Brits had gone tits up at Dunkirk in May 1940 and the Soviets were continuing to reel from Operation Barbarossa, which launched in June 1941. Shortly after the capture of the Germans, FDR issued Executive Proclamation 2561, which created a military tribunal to try their cases. They were thus charged not under civil law but American laws of war dating back to 1775 — the ones that allowed combatants to summarily execute spies and saboteurs. (During the Revolution, both the American Nathan Hale and the British Major John André were hanged as spies.)
Instead, the operatives were given a military tribunal, convicted, and six of the eight (all had lived in the U.S. and two”
https://the-pipeline.org/the-column-fight-with-soldiers-not-lawyers/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. Where I practice, if you win the argument before the Court, it is considered good lawyering.
LikeLike
LikeLike
The ACLU “lost” the district case, and the appeal, only to “win” a lawless order from Souter 2.0.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The filings were in response to the Sc stay. They were not filings due before rhe stay.
It would be nice if the Sc “corrected” itself and forced the ACLU to pay bond for losing at the Tx district and appellate level, before it’s lawless intervention
LikeLike
Oh no, is this Muh retribution too?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/doj-announces-rico-charges-against-27-alleged-venezuelan-gang-members-5845435?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp&src_src=partner&src_cmp=gp
LikeLike
The gnome should cut rates. He was in a rush to cut them for Joe (quemala) when inflation was rising.
BREAKING: Undercover footage from @JamesOKeefeIII
shows Federal Reserve Principal Economist Aurel Hizmo describing Jerome Powell as “somebody who held the line against, like, Trump” and refused to help improve the economy under his administration.
.
Undercover: “Does Jerome Powell hate Trump?”
.
Hizmo: “Yeah, of course.”
.
Hizmo continued:
“He [Trump] wanted to stimulate the economy. But he [Powell] wouldn’t do it. He started raising interest rates—doing the opposite of what Trump wanted.”
.
“We don’t want Trump to be in the government.”
LikeLike
SCOTUS Opinions are now lawless when they disagree with Trump?
LikeLike
a lawless order from Souter 2.0.”
LOL
Tina now decides which SCOTUS decisions are “lawless”.
You can’t make this sh-t up.
LikeLike
F–k off, Bitter, stop thinking what I am thinking.
LikeLike
Oh no, is this Muh retribution too?”
Tina doesn’t know the meaning of the word “retribution”.
Not a surprise.
LikeLike
Let me help her out.
noun: retribution
LikeLike
Bitter, good lawyering on a micro level. Abuse of the system on a macro level.
But the main culprit is the judiciary for legislating from the bench. Supreme Court Justices of all stripes have complained about national injunctions for quite awhile, but haven’t done anything about it. Maybe they will in this case.
Chicon
LikeLike
I received my law degree in 1993. I guess I need to go back for an update on Trump Law.
LikeLike
Tina wrote – The gnome should cut rates. He was in a rush to cut them for Joe (quemala) when inflation was rising——-
I don’t know about that Tina. money supply is still huge from Covid and the Biden spending spree. Velocity is also ticking up. According to Friedman, this is the tinder (excess money supply) and spark (velocity of money) of all inflation. I can see a minor proactive lowering of rates as the year progresses, but not a precipitous reduction as is being called for. That being said, I’m no fan of Powell and can’t wait for him to go. His politicized “transitory” inflation call in 2021, refusing to raise rates and giving Dems the cover to spend more, unleashed historic inflation on this country and destroyed trillions of our buying power. He ignored the obvious data screaming for rate increases to hold back inflation. That alone should welcome his replacement.
LikeLike
interesting case before the Supreme Court today. Rooting for the Parents –
“The Montgomery County Board of Education sparked a firestorm in March 2023 when it notified parents that they will no longer be able to opt their elementary-level students out of instruction involving books on gender and sexuality.
A list of LGBT-themed storybooks was added to the district’s curriculum for pre-kindergarten through fifth grade in November 2022. The books included titles such as “Pride Puppy,” which describes what a child might see at a Pride parade; “What Are Your Words,” which centers on a child whose pronouns change “like the weather”; and “Love, Violet,” a story about a same-sex playground romance.
At the time, the county assured parents they would retain the right to exclude their children from any lessons concerning such materials. The policy change that came months later retracted that right and prompted local parents of diverse faiths to sue.
“The First Amendment has long been recognized to protect the right of parents to direct the religious education and upbringing of their children, and the government is not allowed to substantially interfere with that,” Mike O’Brien, counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, told The Epoch Times.
O’Brien will make that argument on the parents’ behalf on April 22, when their case goes before the Supreme Court in the case of Mahmoud v. Taylor. They are seeking the restoration of their right to direct and protect their children’s religious beliefs, O’Brien said.”
The Montgomery County Board of Education sparked a firestorm in March 2023 when it notified parents that they will no longer be able to opt their elementary-level students out of instruction involving books on gender and sexuality.
A list of LGBT-themed storybooks was added to the district’s curriculum for pre-kindergarten through fifth grade in November 2022. The books included titles such as “Pride Puppy,” which describes what a child might see at a Pride parade; “What Are Your Words,” which centers on a child whose pronouns change “like the weather”; and “Love, Violet,” a story about a same-sex playground romance.
At the time, the county assured parents they would retain the right to exclude their children from any lessons concerning such materials. The policy change that came months later retracted that right and prompted local parents of diverse faiths to sue.
“The First Amendment has long been recognized to protect the right of parents to direct the religious education and upbringing of their children, and the government is not allowed to substantially interfere with that,” Mike O’Brien, counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, told The Epoch Times.
O’Brien will make that argument on the parents’ behalf on April 22, when their case goes before the Supreme Court in the case of Mahmoud v. Taylor. They are seeking the restoration of their right to direct and protect their children’s religious beliefs, O’Brien said.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/these-parents-removed-their-kids-from-school-the-supreme-court-is-about-to-hear-why-5842234?
LikeLike
I wonder if the lawyers who won Roe v. Wade and Dred Scott performed good layering?
I guess it’s like the kid saying it’s okay as long as mom & dad say it is okay. Definitely the judges’ fault, but good lawyering isn’t always a good result. No offense Bitter.
Chicon
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fla, good point on previous Executives exercising their executive powers over Judicial objections.
Roberts knows that courts can only have power if their rulings are perceived as legitimate.
We’ll see how the Court handles this mess for which it is partially responsible.
Chicon
LikeLiked by 1 person
but good lawyering isn’t always a good result. No offense Bitter.
Zzzzzzz Lawyers argue. Judges decide.
LikeLike
Roberts knows that courts can only have power if their rulings are perceived as legitimate.”
LOL
Chicon elevates “moron” to a entirely new level.
No, SCOTUS judges should not decide based on what is “most popular”.
Their job is to rule according to the constitution, whether it is “popular” or “perceived as legitimate” or not.
I know that is news to the Cultists, who think SCOTUS needs to rule the way Trump thinks they should.
Overturning Roe vs. Wade was not “popular”. But none of the Cultists here complained.
LikeLike
Fla, good point”
The Cultists should just decide that whatever any other Cultist says is absolutely brilliant, and that would save them the time of having to post sycophantic congratulations on their brilliance to each other.
LikeLike
Bitter, is forum shopping good lawyering?
Is taking one case to dozens of courts at the same time good lawyering?
Are both of the above good for the judicial system? How about for society?
Chicon
LikeLike
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/trump-appointed-federal-judge-slams-far-left-aclu/
LikeLike
ACLU was clearly forum shopping.
Has the sc even determined whether the Acku has standing?
LikeLike
Jason, did I say “popular”? I believe I said (as you quoted) “perceived as legitimate”.
There’s a difference, Mr. Goal Post.
Chicon
LikeLike
Yup Souter 2.0 is responsible for the aclu/illegal criminal case.
You either want an immigration court to handle this, then appellate, and then the sc level or you do what Souter 2.0 did on Saturday.
There was no need for Souter, beitch, et al to get involved.
Alito told them why.
LikeLike
Two weeks ago the freepassers were upset that trump bypased the district court “judge” for the sc.
LikeLike
She raises a good point about the illegal communication wirh the Texas judge and Bosos first handling of this case:
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1914685383683567976?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
LikeLike
Roberts has often expressed a desire to maintain the legitimacy of the Court.
Jason (in a classic case of projection) to call Roberts a moron in 3…2…1….
Chicon
LikeLike
Fla,
Your 9:50 take on Jerome Powell is very interesting. I would agree with most of your points. As you suggest, the Fed has taken several unproductive actions during his term in office. In addition, I would like to see them bring back required reserves, to pay down the balance sheet to get rid of all the mortgage backed securities they still hold, and to quit messing in the long end of the bond market.
The question in my mind is this – If Powell goes, who can Trump nominate that will be more responsible and a better monetary-policy guy? I am not aware of any decent macro-economists that can stand Trump, much less be willing to kiss his (insert a body part here) in the way that Trump will demand.
If he were to choose a hack like Kevin Hassett, Larry Kudlow, or (God forbid) Peter Navarro, the results would be a disaster. Better the devil you know, IMHO.
LikeLike
About the mess in which The Court finds itself……
https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/22/the-courts-are-the-scofflaws-behind-our-current-constitutional-crisis/
I know that legal status is important to Bitter, so this is the author’s experience……”Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.”
Chicon
LikeLike
Chico’s I believe the freepassers dislike Margot. Something about her being in a cult?
LikeLike
Chicon*
LikeLike
Forum shopping? Good lawyering for the client. Not necessarily good for the judicial system or society. Any other questions?
LikeLike
Why doesn’t Tina call the other women Justices beotches? Probably because she admires that they follow a rigid political and legal philosophy unlike the conservatives who think for themselves.
LikeLike
Permanent law clerk? Zzzzzzzzz. Get out and practice law, slacker.
LikeLike
I know that legal status is important to Bitter
Only when judging legal issues, Judges, and lawyers. I will defer to doctors on medical issues and orchestra conductors on classical music. However, I do not require somebody to be a baker to judge whether a cookie tastes good. I am complex.
LikeLike
It is interesting to find a woman who hates women as much as Tina does. Or maybe not. I don’t watch the shows but the Real Housewives series get good ratings and they all hate each other.
LikeLike
Of the 135 cardinal electors eligible to vote, 109 were appointed by Francis himself, comprising approximately 80% of the electorate.
This significant majority suggests that the next pope is likely to continue or even intensify Francis’s left-wing trajectory.
LikeLike
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
In light of federal judge’s accusations of misconduct by ACLU attorney in Alien Enemies Act lawsuit in Texas, let’s see what Judge Boasberg had to say about his contact with same lawyer on March 15 in 1st AEA case:
How was Boasberg “alerted” at 7:25am? Did Lee Gelernt, the same atty in Texas case, also leave a similar voicemail for Boasberg after filing the lawsuit?
Note Boasberg’s shifting explanations as to how he got the case (his order on the right). How did he “connect” with ACLU that morning right before entering his 1st temp restraining order banning the removal of 5 unnamed Venezuelans?
************
Good questions. Maybe the good judge can be asked to explain under oath in front of Congress?
Make sure you tell the truth, Judge.
Chicon
LikeLike
Bitter, if a lawyer breaks a rule and gets the desired outcome, is that good lawyering?
Chicon
LikeLike
Back in Trump’s first term there was a desire to revamp the State Dep. However, Pompeo was against it, so it didn’t happen. It’s interesting that it was also Pompeo who discouraged Trump from declassifying and releasing the Kennedy file. On the surface Pompeo appeared to be an asset to Trump’s agenda. But, somehow, it seems he was more a door stop, in subtle ways, much like Mike Pence turned out to be. Rubio, so far, seems to be a stronger SOS than those in the past.
Secretary Marco Rubio
@SecRubio
·
Follow
Today is the day. Under @POTUS’ leadership and at my direction, we are reversing decades of bloat and bureaucracy at the State Department. These sweeping changes will empower our talented diplomats to put America and Americans first.
LikeLike
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
BREAKING: Top US Neuroscientist & Military Advisor Confirms Reports Are ‘Credible’ That Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Have Happened on US Soil And Targeted US Personnel Abroad; Exclusive New Records Reveal Exposure to “Microwave Weapon” After Intel Officer Discovered Secret Op.
**********
https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1914689369157349784
Hopefully, this journalist is deemed credible by The Kool Kidz….
Let’s see what the 700+ federal judges (aka The Bosses of The Government and The Super Legislature) will allow the Executive branch to do about this.
Chicon
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz It will get a finding of contempt and may earn referral to the Discipline Board.
Chi – If a Court disagrees with Trump should it be dissolved and all non-Trump appointees impeached?
LikeLike
Catherine Herridge is a very credible investigative journalist on the same level as Sheryl Attkisson. The link to the DEW attacks is very disconcerting to think about.
LikeLike
@amuse
@amuse
FLASHBACK: When Biden decided to begin granting all illegals ‘auto-parole’ the floodgates opened and every illegal was eligible for an SSN. 20 states sued and got an injunction stopping the policy. SCOTUS lifted the order citing separation of powers insisting Biden should be able to run the government as he saw fit until the litigation concluded. When Trump is using his power granted to him by Congress and Article 2 SCOTUS decides he shouldn’t be able to run the government.
***********
I’m sure there’s an explanation…..
Chicon
LikeLike
Sean Davis
@seanmdav
John Roberts sat around and did nothing while U.S. citizens were thrown in solitary confinement without a trial for years, but when a foreign terrorist illegal was deported, Roberts suddenly became very concerned with due process.
***********
The government tried a novel (and wrong) approach to make J6 trespassing cases into felonies. The defendants got to sit in jail for three years (that’s years, not days or weeks….) before the Court finally ruled.
Maybe Bitter can explain it all….
Chicon
LikeLike
Sean Davis
@seanmdav
·
17h
According to John Roberts, the president can order the assassination of a U.S. citizen via drone strike without court approval, but he can’t deport the citizen of a foreign nation who entered the U.S. illegally.
**********
Makes sense to someone, eh?
Chicon
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those Sean Davis posts are spot on. When you read and think about the comparisons and contrasts to how and what the SC intervenes on or ignores, there seems to be no sense or fairness to their rulings
LikeLiked by 1 person
In your arrogant dismissal of me as an attorney, you wouldn’t understand the explanation. Go back to Gateway Pundit Law School. Sit next to Tina and take good notes. Oh wait. She doesn’t take notes. She copies and posts links.
LikeLike
There’s been occasional talk of drone strikes by the US on Mexican cartel people in Mexico. Any chance a federal judge issues a TRO? If so, should Trump ignore it?
Chicon
LikeLike
Cop out. Translation: I have no idea (just like everyone else).
Chicon
LikeLike
Bitter said….”It will get a finding of contempt and may earn referral to the Discipline Board.”
I get that, but I asked if it is good lawyering.
Chicon
LikeLike
They can fly the illegals in but not out.
Seems logical.
LikeLike
My goodness, you are all getting tiresome.
Tina – if I cared what Gateway Pundit had to say, I would read it myself.
Chicon – you haven’t contributed anything but snark for days now. Please go away, get some help, and stop insulting everyone on this blog.
Bitter & Jason – Just keep reminding us all of everything that has even been said on HHR.
LikeLike
I appreciate Bill recognizing my contribution to HHR.
LikeLike
Bill, ask Bitter for a refund.
Chicon
LikeLike
The freepassers will be upset with the reform at the department of state.
LikeLike
Jason, did I say “popular”? I believe I said (as you quoted) “perceived as legitimate”.
There’s a difference, Mr. Goal Post.”
No difference in this context.
“Legitimacy” of a decision, to the general population, is in the eye of the beholder, akin to popularity.
People who agree with SC rulings do so because they approve of it or think it was the right decision, i.e. the popular decision. If they don’t agree, it means it was not a “popular” decision.
LikeLike
SCOTUS decides he shouldn’t be able to run the government.”
LOL
Chicon wins “Stupidest Interpretation” of 2025, with the caveat it is still early.
LikeLike
Chicon – you haven’t contributed anything but snark for days now. Please go away, get some help, and stop insulting everyone on this blog.”
Days?
Generous and magnanimous bastard.
LikeLike
Wussing alert.
LikeLike
The freepassers will be upset with the reform at the department of state”
Damm, Tina is falling behind on identifying people for things never said at HHR.
She owes us all a whole list of ‘freepassers”.
Maybe she will take the weekend off to catch up.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Tina – if I cared what Gateway Pundit had to say, I would read it myself.”
That is mean.
Tina never had an original thought here, you have to allow her some sources, even if they are admittedly complete garbage.
LikeLike
but he can’t deport the citizen of a foreign nation who entered the U.S. illegally.”
Zzzzzz…..
I’ll take “things Roberts never said for $1000 please”
LikeLike
Rubio, so far, seems to be a stronger SOS than those in the past.”
Rubio is being rehabilitated?
Who wouda thunk.
He was on Tina’s RINO list for years.
LikeLike
Fly or bus illegals in = no problemo
Remove said illegals= big problem,
-Us Supreme Court of illegals.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Zzzzzz….
LikeLike
I think Luna is a fruitcake.
But if she can troll Van Hollen, great.
LikeLike
Btw, has the sc lifted its stay?
Beotchy should be done with the hair and nail appts.
Souter should have completed his estrogen series.
LikeLike
We will see how she sides. But she is a train wreck.
https://www.newsweek.com/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-obamacare-2062499
LikeLike
Any predictions on birthright citizenship?
I think it will be 9-0, but maybe that is just wishful thinking for a decision I think would be legitimate (and popular to me).
I understand many Cultists think Alito and Thomas will vote their way, but they are Constitutionalists and I just don’t see how they get around what the Amendment actually says.
We will see. I think there is a 95% chance it will be 9-0, 8-1, or 7-2.
If I am wrong, GFYs.
LikeLike
But she is a train wreck.”
Translation:
I don’t agree with every decision she makes.
LikeLike
@Cernovich
·
Follow
Hundreds of J6 defendants had been charged under a statue that did not apply to their conduct. Misdemeanor trespass was converted into a felony. John Roberts took 3 years to hear the cases of Americans who had been wrongfully convicted. 3 years! But he works overnight for MS-13.
LikeLike
My goodness, you are all getting tiresome.
BillW, if that’s the case, why do you even post here? Also your assessments of posters here differ from mine. Chicon gives pithy responses to the insulting ones handed out by Jason. Tina is a long time contributor here, giving funny handles to the elite, as well as relevant info about the news of the day. Jason never changes from being a bully. And, Bitter is a nice guy who sometimes likes to take on the a**hole mystique.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Jason said…”I’ll take “things Roberts never said for $1000 please””
Phew, I was under the impression that the Court Friday barred some deportation of illegals.
Chicon
LikeLike
Oh no, the free passers will be upset with this. Maybe, the aclu can shop this one too.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/us-troops-given-authority-to-detain-illegal-immigrants-trespassing-in-newly-militarized-land-5845601?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp&src_src=partner&src_cmp=gp
LikeLike
Jason said…”I just don’t see how they get around what the Amendment actually says.”
The need to interpret the meaning of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, which is what the Amendment actually says.
I long ago predicted 60-40 Trump loses, so I’ll stick with that 6-3 (could be 5-4).
Chicon
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz Tina knows that nobody at HHR supports illegal immigration but just can’t stop lying.
LikeLike
Jan said….”Jason never changes from being a bully.”
That’s unfair to Jason; he’s quite often a moron, too.
Chicon
LikeLike
Tina really hates women. She hates them so much she pretends Roberts takes female hormones.
LikeLike
It’s only temporary. Tina’s RINO list is like the Hotel California. You can check out any time but you can never leave.
LikeLike
You can read all the stuff in the souer 2.0 highjacking of the aclu case here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24a1007.html
LikeLike
Name names.
LikeLike
On the birthright citizenship case and my prediction……
It takes four justices to accept a case (unless it is an original jurisdiction case, which this is not). There was no split among the circuit courts, so not taking the case would have let stand all the rulings barring the EO (without the political heat for doing so).
So, why did they take the case? Could be that they thought they should, given that the topic was a big campaign issue. It could also mean that at least four want to overrule the lower courts and uphold the EO.
Roberts likes to avoid political pressure on the Court if he can avoid it (he’ll take it on if he needs to). They could have easily avoided this case if they like the outcome in the lower courts.
Chicon
LikeLike
New Thread
LikeLike