Launching a new thread starter, to see how well it is received. Google maps has done amazing work in compiling images of many places around the world. And so this thread is started as a contest to see who is first at correctly guessing either which of our 50 states is shown in the picture, or which foreign country. The plan for this thread starter is to provide within the picture a clue or two to help you identify.
Here you go:
Map data ©2023 Google, Jens Peter Hansen
The Hedgehog Report - Phoenix Edition 
101 responses to “Where is this?”
First
LikeLike
I have no clue. A industrial park in York PA?
LikeLike
Gaza?
LikeLike
Delaware
LikeLike
Alaska
LikeLike
Scott Jennings methodically explains to CNN panel that America finally has a real President again:
“I’m just struck by the fact that we have a president again.”
“I mean, look at this guy’s day three speeches, 196 executive actions, holds a 90 minute press conference narrating each one as he goes along. I mean, Joe Biden could not and would not offer the kind of transparency or vigor to the American people that we got here on day one from Trump.”
“The words that came to mind to me were gritty, resilient, determined and audacious.”
“There’s not like a more, perfect, advertisement for the value of these qualities in modern America. I mean, you think about all the things that happened to him winning, losing the court cases, nearly being assassinated.”
“It’s rather audacious what he has accomplished, winning this election and taking office today.”
LikeLike
Greenland.
LikeLike
I rarely agree with the ACLU, but I hope they win this lawsuit. The part in bold is what I particularly agree with.
CONCORD, N.H. — Immigrants’ rights advocates today sued the Trump administration over its executive order that seeks to strip certain babies born in the United States of their U.S. citizenship.
The case was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Asian Law Caucus, State Democracy Defenders Fund, and Legal Defense Fund on behalf of organizations with members whose babies born on U.S. soil will be denied citizenship under the order, including New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and Make the Road New York. The lawsuit charges the Trump administration with flouting the Constitution’s dictates, congressional intent, and longstanding Supreme Court precedent.
“Denying citizenship to U.S.-born children is not only unconstitutional — it’s also a reckless and ruthless repudiation of American values. Birthright citizenship is part of what makes the United States the strong and dynamic nation that it is. This order seeks to repeat one of the gravest errors in American history, by creating a permanent subclass of people born in the U.S. who are denied full rights as Americans. We will not let this attack on newborns and future generations of Americans go unchallenged. The Trump administration’s overreach is so egregious that we are confident we will ultimately prevail,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Birthright citizenship is the principle that every baby born in the United States is a U.S. citizen. The Constitution’s 14th Amendment guarantees the citizenship of all children born in the United States (with the extremely narrow exception of children of foreign diplomats) regardless of race, color, or ancestry. Specifically, it states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, overturning the Dred Scott decision that denied Black Americans the rights and protections of U.S. citizenship. In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark that children born in the United States to immigrant parents were entitled to U.S. citizenship, and the principle has remained an undisturbed constitutional bedrock for over a century.“
LikeLike
No fair. Walt has been everywhere on Earth. Twice.
LikeLike
We will not let this attack on newborns and future generations of Americans go unchallenged.
Irony Meter explodes as the ACLU is fine with attacking the rights of unborn children. Still, I do agree that birthright citizenship is protected and Trump’s action will fail in the courts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you want to keep illegal immigrants from having American babies, then stop them at the border.
NYC’s strategy of WE ARE WINNING resulted in 20 million illegals. Their children WILL be US citizens.
But maybe, just maybe we weren’t winning.
There were plenty of opportunities to enact comprehensive immigration reform that would have secured the border in exchange for granting working permits for millions of illegals already here.
But the immigration deadenders called it “amnesty” and wanted all or nothing. They got nothing.
We should have a prediction thread here on how many illegals will actually be deported. My prediction is less than 5%.
LikeLike
Irony Meter explodes as the ACLU is fine with attacking the rights of unborn children”
Yep. They are hypocrites. They are wrong on most issues.
They happen to be right on this one.
LikeLike
It looks like the Southwest to me.
I’ll say Arizona.
LikeLike
Probably Greenland, but I want to say that it’s the York Co. ASPCA facility.
LikeLike
Walt and jason are the closest guesses so far.
LikeLike
Walt being closer than Jason
LikeLike
It must then be Iceland
LikeLike
Not Iceland
LikeLike
There is one visible clue right in the picture
LikeLike
Newfoundland
LikeLike
Deportation raids have begun.
LikeLike
Norway
LikeLike
Thule Space Command Base
LikeLike
Despite all his personal flaws, Trump became the symbol/lightning rod that the majority of people who were upset with federal government growth, overreach, incompetence and instances of corruption/ They gravitated to Trump and pinned their hopes on him being able to change that. Trump became the standard bearer for these folks. Lots of people, for lots of reasons, do not trust the federal government anymore. They interpreted all the legal and courtroom cases against Trump as politically motivated lawfare by the Ds and anti-Trumpers to ruin him financially and politically. That did not work and only further energized those who distrusted federal government.
The gravitation of power to the federal government has been creeping along steadily for decades (creation of Dept. of Energy, Dept. of Education) but the speed accelerated with the U.S. federal government response to 9-11, the Obama’s presidency and forcing people to buy an insurance product among other things), the CROVID epidemic under Trump’s first term, and obviously with the Biden 4 years of pushing for DEI, normalization attempt regarding LBGTQ-EIEIO ism and lifestyle, pro-transgender crap at the detriment of women’s rights and women’s sports, etc, end run around attempt about parental rights, edicts about what % of all cars have to be all electric, war on fossil fuels, less than adequate federal response to hurricane Helene victims in NC, etc. What has forever been thought of as common sense, went out the window when lefts are in control.
The growth of presidents setting national policy through EOs, the failure to the courts to rein in federal overreach that went beyond what the law stated, the complicit left-wing dominated MSM pushing for everything liberal, timidness of elected Rs to be articulate and fight back effectively against insanity and just go along so they would continue to be reelected, the failure of the few moderate Ds to stand up against the liberal D mob rushing headlong into leftism insanity, the failure of the voting public to vote intelligently and think about the issues and instead allow themselves be herded along by the ever present emotive charges by the leftists of “racism” and every R candidates being called racists, homophobes, sexists, against women’s rights, etc. This is true whether it is about George Floyd and the many destructive riots, the abortion issue, immigration, affirmative action, DEI crap and other issues. Much pushback against the federal overreach has occurred as many, many states (probably an unprecedented number) have enjoined lawsuits against the federal government, related to Obamacare and the federal govt forcing people to buy a product, immigration and a whole host of other issues. And of course, we now have tons of data that has surfaced about CROVID that we now know the federal government was lying to us about.
The left has successfully rendered Congress ineffective concerning the wielding of their constitutional power, so the power vacuum was filled by the federal bureaucracy and activist presidents. It was even filled by left wing dominated cities and states, who declared themselves, in violation of the constitution, sanctuary cities–and got away with doing so without repercussion, and declared themselves nuclear free zones where nothing nuclear could be transported by road or rail through their jurisdictions.
Trump seems to be on the warpath against federal government overreach and is using some of the lefts own weapons (EOs) against the insanity.
LikeLike
Not Newfoundland
LikeLike
Not Thule Space Command Base
LikeLike
Norway
LikeLike
Not Norway, but that’s also a good guess
LikeLike
Walt’s compound.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Walt’s compound.
NO!
WAY too much to have to vacuum and dust.
LikeLike
I remember when most at HHR were against Executive Orders. But those days are over so we are stuck in a cycle of one President issuing EOs and the next President issuing EOs to rescind those and new EOs that will then be rescinded…….
LikeLike
I am against EOs, but there is nothing that can be done about it. NO way we can survive if the other side can do it, but we won’t. Like a boxing match with both hands tied behind your back.
LikeLike
Trump seems to be on the warpath against federal government overreach and is using some of the lefts own weapons (EOs) against the insanity.
Wow Walt…..that entire post was downright elegant!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, not Newfoundland, Norway, Iceland or Greenland? Ok…how about Spitsbergen Island?
LikeLike
Scratch that, not with those cars parked there.
LikeLike
So it is not anywhere in Canada….
Russia?
LikeLike
Denmark?
LikeLike
Jake Lang – January 6 Political Prisoner
@JakeLangJ6
Hey
@elonmusk
they are STILL HOLDING me & 20 other J6 Political Prisoners hostage inside the Washington DC Jail Gulag & WONT LET US LEAVE!!! I was swarmed & assaulted by prison officials including Lt. Allen & his Emergency Response Team (ERT) Thugs last night while sitting all packed up to leave!!!! Our were families are standing outside in below freezing 10° weather until 1am when they released 2 hostages, there are still 20 of us in here!!! Please help us rebuild our broken lives donation site is http://J6Rebuild.com & get us out of the Swamp Gulag – I’ve been here 4 years and 5 days WITHOUT A TRIAL!!!
LikeLike
I see jason has continued his “racist xenophobe” attacks, typical of those of the Left, and which shows the true low character of his person.
I’ll repeat – nowhere did I say any citizen was “less” than I am.
https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/birthright-citizenship-fundamental-misunderstanding-the-14th-amendment
https://fedsoc.org/fedsoc-review/birthright-citizenship-two-perspectives
Also, if one was to look at the link from Federalist Society, there is a clear difference of opinion that should be clarified and/or rectified. I tend to agree with those who want to end the practice of allowing illegal immigrants to come here, have a child, and then depart back to their native lands, where the child would then be a United States citizen, but would be “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” of the country they moved back to.
I stated clearly that I make an exception for LEGAL immigrants who, while in the process of naturalization, give birth to a child before the process is complete. I would think that child, once the parent completes the naturalization process, would also then become a citizen.
Bitterlaw also mentioned the original opposition came by those who opposed citizenship for blacks. I think that would be one more factor in favor of my position. I think that a black person, possibly a former slave, should definitely have been been granted birthright citizenship, for several reasons, one of them being that he actually lived here, and was “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” of the United States, with no allegiance to any other country, compared to an ILLEGAL immigrant who comes here, has a child, then immediately departs back to their home country with the child. How Bitterlaw doesn’t see a difference between a former slave and/or marginalized black freeperson living in the United States getting citizenship vs an illegal immigrant makes me wonder about his thought process.
The best part about jason’s “racist xenophobe” argument would be if Justice Thomas ended up agreeing with my position, which I believe there is a good possibility he would.
That said – still believe it is a good argument to have. AND, since there is ambiguity in the law, it should be clarified.
If certain Republicans want to join Democrats in allowing ILLEGAL immigrants to continue getting citizenship and/or benefits quicker and easier than LEGAL immigrants, than let’s see who they are. I think that is a conversation worth having.
I look forward to jason welcoming in a child of Vlad Putin, Chairman Xi and No Korea’s Kim, if they want to go that route.
LikeLike
“So it is not anywhere in Canada….
Russia?”
-Can Sarah P. see it from her house?
LikeLike
NYC – You are an American citizen because you were born in America. Not because your parents were born in America. So you are an American citizen for the same reason that the child of an illegal born here is an American citizen. Sorry.
LikeLike
Trump ends secret service protection for bolton
LikeLike
“NYC – You are an American citizen because you were born in America.”
-So, if my parents were visiting Europe, and gave birth to me, I wouldn’t be an American citizen?
Is that what you are saying?
LikeLike
LikeLike
As the sil sumitted a false affidavit, it is time to prosecute. Don’t let Kavanaugh 2.0 go unpunished like they did with the weird lady and her beach friends
LikeLike
Svalbard
LikeLike
WE HAVE A WINNER!
LikeLike
Longyearbyen, Svalbard
78.222088, 15.650959 if you want a closer look. One of the northernmost communities in the world.
LikeLike
And the clue was visible for all to see at the right edge you could see the letters Sval
LikeLike
Wait, I was right, it is Longyearbyen on Spitsbergen Island, in the Svalbard Archipelago. You can see the big building in the background;
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-the-town-longyearbyen-capital-of-svalbard-spitsbergen-norway-50460837.html?imageid=10A2B739-5C72-448D-9AE5-9B2F7CD58101&p=80940&pn=1&searchId=5c87378e0468a0dd00c889441fb6f252&searchtype=0
LikeLike
Svalbard = Spitsbergen, which is a part of Norway. Just saying.
LikeLike
https://maps.app.goo.gl/mB5DdPewiGXGhdJV6
LikeLike
I move for a split prize.
LikeLike
Bitter is also correct. I had trouble making the image out on my phone earlier, a bit grainy.
LikeLike
BillW, before you I could award you the prize, you canceled it in the next post.
LikeLike
sorry, was GF that canceled the guess.
And Norway is not specific enough.
LikeLike
DW – The entire reason I joined back up with you jokers is that I was so frustrated that no one realized the picture was Svalbard. Rather than stay frustrated, I authenticated and answered the question….and then you (incorrectly) said I was wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would point out that the question asked for a state or country. Svalbard is neither.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought this was a tough one, because the ground is not what you would expect for somewhere that close to the north pole, and someone’s Arizona guess was partly believable.
LikeLike
Fair enough BillW, so I messed up the first edition of the game. It happens. I will bring this one back for round 2 next week sometime. Thanks everyone for playing along.
LikeLike
BillW…glad to draw you out of hiding. Don’t make yourself a stranger.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, although I expected at least one GFY.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like this game!!! I was going to say Norway or Faroe Islands.
LikeLike
For what it’s worth, wiki says, “Svalbard … previously known as Spitsbergen”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Faroe would have been another excellent guess.
LikeLike
Ok, now that we got Svalbard, could someone let me know if I am an American citizen or not, if my American parents gave birth to me in Europe while they were on vacation?
LikeLike
From US Customs and Immigration:
“You can become a U.S. citizen by birth or through
naturalization. Generally, people are born U.S. citizens
if they are born in the United States or if they are
born abroad to U.S. citizens. You may also derive
U.S. citizenship if you were under 18 and a lawful
permanent resident when one or both of your parents
naturalized, or after adoption by a U.S. citizen parent.”
So, yes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I am a citizen of Svalbard?
LikeLike
“or if they are born abroad to U.S. citizens.”
-Bitterlaw,
-So, if my parents were visiting Svalbard, and gave birth to me, I wouldn’t be an American citizen?
Is that what you are saying?
LikeLike
You know exactly what I am saying about the circumstances of your birth. Don’t dance. You told us you were born here.
LikeLike
I saw the SVA. Good topic.
LikeLike
GFY. Sorry about the delay.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You got your answer already. Didn’t you tell us you were born in the U.S.? GFY
LikeLike
Bitterlaw it looks like you are incorrect.
Because my parents are American citizens, I am therefore an American citizen.
Actually, had a friend in grammar and high school, who was born in London, dad was living there for a Wall Street firm.
He was an American citizen at birth, BECAUSE his parents American citizenship was conferred onto him, despite being born in another country.
Thanks, Bitterlaw, for making sure that point was fleshed out, and once again, lends credence to the idea that an ILLEGAL immigrant having a child here more likely should make that child a citizen of the parents home country.
LikeLike
“You told us you were born here.”
-I was. To American citizens. And they conferred their citizenship onto me, just like my friends parents who had him in London.
Thanks!
LikeLike
When I come to think about it, my wife works in a grammar school, where a child (8th grade now, came back in 5th), who is black, was born overseas (France) to her American-citizen-parents. Speaks fluent French, Spanish and English. Parents taught her English, nanny spoke to her in French, housekeepers spoke to her in Spanish.
Her citizenship was conferred onto her from her parents.
Thanks again, Bitterlaw.
LikeLike
Think I may take a trip to Svalbard with my family, to Thank the citizens of that nation for clearing this up.
Bitterlaw, would you like to join us?
LikeLike
But to BillW’s point, Svalbard is the property of Norway, and that’s how I wrote up the game, a country or US state, so BillW is the winner. Going forward with these threads, I will be careful to make sure the sovereignty of the land pictured.
LikeLike
Despite not winning the contest here, I have had an EXCELLENT day.
Completed all HOME chores here, took my snowblower wheel in to get fixed (@ no charge), navigated shopping at 5 stores and got all my groceries, etc successfully, and found both my Black and Mild originals and Sweets for 99 and 89 cents per box (instead of the 1.39 per cigar at reg. price). Also getting lots of likes and comments on my various humorous Facebook posts I put up last night.
*************
Update on Don: he will be going from hosp. to Hospice palative care here close to where I live. The missus took Ci dy up to the Winchester hospital today. She is the POA for both Don and Cindy….
Yesterday at 4 p.m. the doctor admitted they are at a loss as to why he declined so rapidly.
LikeLike
lends credence to the idea that an ILLEGAL immigrant having a child here more likely should make that child a citizen of the parents home country.
That is only more likely if you completely ignore the 14th Amendment.
Whether that child is also a citizen of the parents’ home country is a separate issue.
LikeLike
You are a citizen because of your parents AND also because of your birth place. Both can be true.
Go Amend the Constitution. You are not going to win this issue in the courts.
LikeLike
NYC – Did the child of an illegal born here steal your lunch money? You also have an issue with legal immigration.
We need to secure the border but if you would rather repeal the 14th Amendment you have work to do.
LikeLike
From the Heritage link:
“This amendment’s language was derived from the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which provided that “[a]ll persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power” would be considered citizens.”
-“That is only more likely if you completely ignore the 14th Amendment.”
Or maybe you are ignoring what the writers of the amendment meant when they wrote it. Wouldn’t be the first time bureaucrats “interpreted” a statute incorrectly, and there should be a clarification.
That said, once again, I think it is a good conversation to have.
Any Republicans who think that ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS coming here and deserve the same benefits and rights as freed slaves, let them stand up and be counted.
One other thing: On the national security front, It is pretty clear that individuals/groups are using our laws against us, similar to what they are doing in the UK, France, Sweden, Germany, etc. People actively come here, by plane, have a child, and then go back to their home country, where the child is raised, with his American citizenship to be used at a later date, if needed. Of course, many of those who do this do not have nefarious reasons for doing so. BUT, there is enough of a risk that the rules should be changed, and as well, the current immigration laws should be more vigorously enforced so that illegals can’t enter as easily as they do.
LikeLike
OK I just saw the hegesth allegation, and I realize y’all mag have already discussed it, but I think its disgusting that they are going down this avenue once again…and that the media doesn’t call out the left on it.
It’s absurd to think that after all this time all of a sudden his EX sister in law comes out with this bogus allegation, refuted by the ex wife, and yet, the media and leftists Senators are running with it
Garbage
LikeLiked by 1 person
“NYC – Did the child of an illegal born here steal your lunch money? You also have an issue with legal immigration.
We need to secure the border but if you would rather repeal the 14th Amendment you have work to do.”
-You really are a simpleton.
Why do I need to have an issue with someone to think a situation is wrong?
I do not have any issue with legal immigration.
I do have an issue with people who believe a border should never be closed, and/or the numbers of LEGAL immigrants should never be lowered if the situation changes.
A nation should be able to look at a situation and say “Stop, we can’t accept any more people at this time.”
We have done it in the past, we should probably do it again, until we straighten out the current situation.
Draw the line today – if you are on the legal immigration pathway by 01/31/2025, that will be the last date to sign up until the administration says so.
What is wrong with such an action? Are we not a sovereign nation?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“You are a citizen because of your parents.”
-That was enough for me. And for my childhood friend John.
Thanks.
LikeLike
It might be interesting to consider this possibility: A child is born in the US to parents who work at an embassy of another country. Even though the child was born here, he or she would be ‘subject to a foreign power’. Does that child have birthright citizenship? Perhaps not.
To insert my nose even further into your personal quarrel, regardless of how you interpret the 14th Amendment, the President has no role in establishing rules for citizenship. It is not his job. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution enumerates one of the powers of Congress as “to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” The President has no such enumerated power.
So, DJT will certainly be told by the courts that this specific Executive Order will not stand.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The far, far right guy who was elected to the WV House of Delegates to fill an open seat on the district where I NOW LIVE…I predicted he would be a paint in the arse. So far, even before he was sworn in, the governor was hinting he would call a special session. Find out later that big tech approached WV with a proposal to build 4 data centers in WV including at least one on an abandoned coal mine site. All they need is electricity, which we have. They would pay MANY TENS OF MILLIONS IN PROPERTY TAX EACH YEAR TO COUNT GOVTS WHERE THEY WERE LOCATED. The big tech was not asking for any tax breaks or anything. But the delegate elect sends out social media emails and things demanding the voters deluge the governor with their opposition to a special session to “benefit left wing big tech companies and their billionaire owner”. The special session never got off the ground for other reasons and legislators never called into session. But the delegate elected claims credit for stopping it. Another issue talked about in WV is to allow county referendums where the local voters would decide if they wanted to add a 1 cent sales tax in their county, with the revenue staying in the county and going to the county government to address local issues like providing fire and ambulance services. A couple other local goofball R “power to the people” legislators also oppose allowing any referendum that might end up increasing taxes. The new nut job delegate elect is on a social media campaign opposing “this tax increase.” HE CLAIMS to be in favor of local control and power to the voters, but does not trust the voters and fears they may approve the 1 cent sales tax increase. He is blistering any local legislator who favors this and is calling them all sorts of names like Fake Republicans, liberal tax grabber, etc.
LikeLike
interesting take on Data Centers. While they do use large amounts of power (energy), that power can be redirected in crisis time as they have protocols for low power operations in times of need.
Additionally, they do create vast income to the state, not only in taxes paid, but also in jobs created which revitalize communities that are struggling. Just the building of four data centers would pump over $1B into the local economies with jobs, material acquisition, ancillary income to local businesses, et al.
If WV still has a shot at those data centers I would go and implore the Gov to overlook this idiot and have the special session needed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do have an issue with people who believe a border should never be closed,
Name any poster at HHR who ever said the border should never be closed? I only know the ones who call for a secure border.
LikeLike
I do not have any issue with legal immigration.
And then you immediately called for a reduction in legal immigration.
LikeLike
NT at 7:00.
LikeLike
I find thus funny, but my wife is upset with me about this.
Our local tri county area has a group that provides a Facebook page on the weather. It is a good site. They get very touchy though and quickly ban people who ask dumb questions–like “how much snow will I get in Gettysburg” (they ban them because they are NOT IN THE WV TRICOUNTY AREA). Last year, they banned over 600 people from commenting.
After the last snow, they put up a post that said, “Send us your measurements and locations.” Of course I knew they were asking about SNOW totals, but I could not help my stupid self. A made a comment that said “I am about 5’10” tall and weight about 165.” Someone else said their measurements were 36-24-36.
I got banned (after they called me an ass) and they deleted my comment.. I thought it was funny but my wife was horrified I did such a think. She keeps telling me I have to learn to think things in my head and not type…
LikeLike
“And then you immediately called for a reduction in legal immigration.”
-It’s a theoretical proposition.
IF we were to look around, and see that WOW, there are actually over 30 million or so ILLEGALS in this country, what should we do?
Are we able to, as a country, look to reduce LEGAL immigration for a small amount of time, while we dig out from the onslaught of illegals we have taken in? Is that allowed?
And then, once that is done to the agreement of the American people, resume LEGAL immigration?
Is that such a radical idea if we needed to contemplate it?
LikeLike
“I got banned (after they called me an ass) and they deleted my comment.. I thought it was funny but my wife was horrified I did such a think. She keeps telling me I have to learn to think things in my head and not type…”
-Walt, obviously, went to some of those same “locker rooms” where Trump visited, where he spoke about “grabbing….”!
LikeLike
Vic,
my sources say that WV is still talking with the big tech guys about the possibility of 4 data centers in WV.
Nut you can bet the ranch that goofball R nutjob, far right radical, WV freedom constituonal conservative who represents me and my district will LOUDLY lead the opposition to this and pitch a major hissy fit. Maybe chain himself to the Capitol doors.
LikeLike
NYC
??
but I never grabbed anyone in the….
I just make a joke…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Lone Ranger rode into town and stopped at the restaurant. The owner said “Well if it isn’t the Lone Ranger again. Do you want the usual?” The Lone Ranger said, “Yes. Scrambled eggs and bacon for me, and a bowl of curds and a bowl of whey for my horse Silver.”
The owner went in the kitchen to fill the order and discovered he had eggs, bacon and plenty of curds–but was out of whey. He brought the food out to the Lone Ranger and said:
“I owe Silver a whey.”
LikeLike
AND THAT, my friends,
is why the Lone Ranger always rode off and said, “I owe Silver a whey!” to REMIND himself to go back to that restaurant and get Silver that whey he was still owed.
LikeLike
schiffty placed a 7 day hold on Bondi
LikeLike
Sweden
LikeLike