As the Arctic ice continues to melt due to global warming, Greenland’s mineral and energy resources – including iron ore, lead, zinc, diamonds, gold, rare earth elements, uranium and oil – are becoming more accessible”
DW did touch on a good point, there IS plenty of gold in Greenland.
except there is no reason to believe that ice is melting on Greenland. Several years ago researchers located an abandoned WWII plane that landed on Greenland’s ice, only they had to dig way down deep into the ice to get it out, given the huge growth of ice
DEM STRATEGIST JAMES CARVILLE: "We made [the election] about Trump and we didn’t make it about voters […] How could I, at 80 years old, been doing this for 50 years, lapse into that level of stupidity?pic.twitter.com/sIGLuHLzTD
The Biden White House looks like the Star Wars bar today. With Biden handing out cheap tequila shots (Biden presidential medals) to the Trump-deranged losers.
This will make it harder for the Freedom (not) Caucus hostage taking morons to oust Johnson.
“The rules package, which passed in a 215-209 vote, requires nine members of the majority party to co-sponsor a motion to vacate the speaker from the top leadership position, up from current rules that only require one. The change offers some breathing room for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) as he enters his first full term as speaker, especially after he faced initial opposition to secure the gavel earlier in the day. “
There is no doubt some glaciers are retreating in Greenland. The causes and consequences are probably not what the eco-terrorists claim but I have seen film of several glaciers that have retreated several miles in the last 30 years. Now whether this has uncovered any ore deposits I don’t know.
1. What becomes of the Greenlanders? Are they granted immediate American citizenship/dual citizenship? Will it be like Puerto Rico with citizenship but not voting for President or having voting rights in Congress? When does the make Greenland a state movement begin?
2. Will West Side story be updated to reflect 3 gangs – the Jets, the Sharks, and Polar Bears?
"President-elect Donald Trump hasn’t been sworn in yet, but his looming return has already upended hundreds of pending prosecutions against his supporters who attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, and has disrupted the ongoing effort…
The “peace agreement” that was not for peace and not an agreement.
“One of the many myths and legends surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine is the idea that Kyiv rejected a reasonable Russian peace deal in the early weeks of the war. In reality, recently obtained documents confirm that the terms offered by the Kremlin in spring 2022 would have left Ukraine partitioned, disarmed, internationally isolated, and utterly unable to defend itself against further Russian aggression. In other words, Vladimir Putin’s alleged peace proposal was in fact a call for unconditional surrender and a blueprint for the destruction of the Ukrainian state.
Documents released this week by Radio Free Europe provide important new insights into the severity of the Kremlin’s demands when Russian and Ukrainian delegations sat down at the negotiating table in the first weeks of the war. As Putin’s armies swept across southern Ukraine and advanced on Kyiv, Russian officials listed their conditions to halt the invasion and implement a ceasefire. The resulting draft treaty spells out the unacceptable costs of what would have amounted to Ukraine’s capitulation.
In terms of territorial concessions, Ukraine was expected to cede Crimea and the Donbas region outright, while also accepting the ongoing occupation of areas then under Russian control until Moscow deemed that its conditions had been fully met. Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.
The most detailed and revealing segment of the draft peace treaty dealt with Ukraine’s demilitarization. Russia called for the Ukrainian army to be drastically reduced to a skeleton force of just fifty thousand personnel. This was approximately one-fifth of the prewar total and a tiny fraction of Ukraine’s current military, which is believed to number around one million soldiers. Meanwhile, tight restrictions were to be imposed on the quantity of armor Ukraine could possess, the types of missiles the country could develop, and the size of the Ukrainian Air Force.
The Kremlin’s peace plan also obliged Ukraine to renounce its NATO membership ambitions and agree not to enter into bilateral alliances or seek military aid from Western countries. In later drafts dating from the final stages of the abortive peace process in April 2022, Russia also somewhat absurdly insisted on a veto over any international response to future attacks on Ukraine. If Ukraine’s leaders had accepted Moscow’s thinly veiled ultimatum, the country would have been disarmed and defenseless.”
The Ukrainian people have been tired of the war for some time. Zelensky has also become less popular because of the war, and he is now looking at Trump’s “unpredictability” to end the war. Of course a wave of disappointment will erupt here for two guys, who only want what they want before any talk of ending the war is discussed.
Zzzzzzzz Ukraine has the right to fight as long as it can and it is in the strategic interest of the U.S. to aid it. As a sovereign nation, it will have to make its decision.
The Putin supporters wanted Ukraine to surrender its sovereignty and become a puppet of Russia.
Reading the alleged agreement terms offered years ago to resolving the Ukraine/Russian conflict quickly, how and what does Ukraine gain by waiting two years and doing it in 2025?
The Ukrainian people have been tired of the war for some time.”
I guess they are tired of having their people displaced, killed, tortured, maimed, kidnapped and exiled and their towns and cities bombed and their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure destroyed and their economy ruined.
But Chicon, Tina, Janzam, and the rest of the Putinistas are still cheering their hero Putin on and making excuses for his war crimes.
TReading the alleged agreement terms offered years ago to resolving the Ukraine/Russian conflict quickly, how and what does Ukraine gain by waiting two years and doing it in 2025?
Zzzzz…
Those will not be the terms, Ukraine will be MORE heavily armed, not less. European troops will be placed in Ukraine to ensure whatever new borders there will be. Ukraine will not be forced to disarm and will not surrender its sovereignty.
Even more importantly, NONE of this will happen.
Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.
Jason says…..”I guess they are tired of having their people displaced, killed, tortured, maimed, kidnapped and exiled and their towns and cities bombed and their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure destroyed and their economy ruined.”
Exactly.
And, as a result, they may decide to cut the best deal they can. Then, you and Bitter will whine like tired three yeat olds about how it’s Trump’s fault.
I think sacrificing tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, lives, wiping complete communities off the map, causing millions to flee their country and tearing apart families is the sad legacy of this unnecessary war. Putin is certainly the villain. But, those defiantly denying reality, seeing Ukraine winning back its original borders, are fools.
“And, as a result, they may decide to cut the best deal they can. Then, you and Bitter will whine like tired three yeat olds about how it’s Trump’s fault.”
Jan – Should Ukraine have accepted the terms outlined by Radio Free Europe?
Weighing the consequences of not signing it, I think the deal would have been better than what they will get now. Does anyone think Putin will negotiate better terms now, after losing so many men, than what he was willing to do before all the bloodshed?
Vance and Don Jr. are pro-Putin and of course have a lot of influence with Trump. But he has some advisors who have previously expressed support for Ukraine and Rubio himself as SOS is no isolationist. In fact, one of the reasons I supported him for President is that I do think he understands geopolitics and is supportive of our alliances and strategic interests.
Maybe I am wrong, but I think Trump will play more hardball with Putin than the Putinistas hope for.
Weighing the consequences of not signing it, I think the deal would have been better than what they will get now”
Geezus, you are one stupid Putin toady.
The “deal”: was unilateral surrender by Ukraine, militarily and culturally too. It would have ended as a sovereign nation.
The most detailed and revealing segment of the draft peace treaty dealt with Ukraine’s demilitarization. Russia called for the Ukrainian army to be drastically reduced to a skeleton force of just fifty thousand personnel. This was approximately one-fifth of the prewar total and a tiny fraction of Ukraine’s current military, which is believed to number around one million soldiers.
Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.
Ukraine’s leaders had accepted Moscow’s thinly veiled ultimatum, the country would have been disarmed and defenseless.“
You really agree Ukraine should have agreed to this?
oes anyone think Putin will negotiate better terms now, after losing so many men, than what he was willing to do before all the bloodshed?”
Of course he will.y
He is not going to get ANY of that.
Ukraine is not going to de-militarize, any deal now will involve strengthening Ukraine’s military and placing foreign troops to ensure Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
And there is not going to be any “Russification” of Ukraine, quite to the contrary.
Tina said…..”The deal will be worse than the pre war one.
The free passers will blame trump when the grifter signs the “new peace deal.”
I think the first is not true, and the second is absolutely true (more so for Bitter than Jason).
Trump will not allow what looks like a loss (to most people) on his record. He wants to say…”the invasion wouldn’t have happened if i was President, and I got a good deal once I returned”. I also think Pooty Poot and Big Z want an escape hatch, and Trump will provide it.
Bitter will rail against the deal almost no matter what it entails; Jason will be considerably more realistic, imo.
Tina said…..”The deal will be worse than the pre war one.”
I posted what that “deal” (it was not a deal, it was a demand) entailed, but Tina the Putinista pretends that a pending agreement would be “worse than that”.
You can’t really deal with that kind of ignorance.
Bitter will rail against the deal almost no matter what it entails; Jason will be considerably more realistic, imo.”
Bitter and I have a few disagreements on Ukraine, he thinks Putin would have invaded even if Trump won in 2020, I would bet big $$$ against it. He is also more pessimistic than I am on how bad Trump’s proposal to end the war will be.
But I think we are in agreement that in a just and fair world, the US would provide whatever aid was required for Ukraine to expel the Russians, make the Russians pay reparations, and bring to justice the war criminals.
Anything less that that is morally wrong.
I am only a “realist” about it because it is not a just a fair world.
Tom Tradup at Townhall demolishes hostage taking moron Thomas Massie…ouch.
“First up at bat on Friday was the comical U.S. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) who clearly has no future with California Psychics.com (the website that boasts it turns down 98% of the psychics who apply for work because of their dubious ability to make accurate predictions.)
Massie—the linear equivalent of Mayberry deputy Barney Fife, who was only issued one bullet on the 1960 TV series “The Andy Griffith Show”—apparently believed he was going to derail U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson’s re-election to a second term as Speaker on the worst domino-theory since the Vietnam War. The Kentucky firebrand—quite likely the biggest blowhard in Congress since former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh—seemed to believe something like this: “If I bellow that I won’t vote for Mike Johnson even if they (?) shove bamboo splints under my fingernails, others will fall in line and join me in my personal vendetta against the Speaker.”
Before the vote took place, Massie must have been watching old films of The Three Stooges, like to one where their Army sergeant asks his troops for three volunteers to take on a dangerous assignment; everyone else takes a few steps back…and Curly, Larry and Moe are left to face the music. (I’m not comparing the brief “dissent” on Friday to the Stooges…particularly because Moe sports a snappier haircut that Thomas Massie.”
68 responses to “Buy Greenland? Seriously? Discuss.”
no reason to buy Greenland unless someone knows it’s loaded with unknown gold mines.
LikeLike
Raw milk can make you sick. But if people want to risk illness, that is on them.”
Zzzzz…
“risk illness” what a load of BS.
Anything can make you sick. The odds of being sick by raw milk are very low.
Billions of people eat sushi, raw meat, raw oysters and clams, etc.
Every supermarket has raw milk cheeses now.
The campaign against raw milk is not based on any real science, it is based on just increasing government control.
LikeLike
I fully support buying Greenland, it has a lot of resources and is strategically positioned.
There were idiots against buying Louisiana territory and Alaska too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As the Arctic ice continues to melt due to global warming, Greenland’s mineral and energy resources – including iron ore, lead, zinc, diamonds, gold, rare earth elements, uranium and oil – are becoming more accessible”
DW did touch on a good point, there IS plenty of gold in Greenland.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am glad this guy is an advisor to Trump, sounds like he is no xenophobic isolationist.
https://hotair.com/stephen-moore/2025/01/05/trump-and-musk-are-right-legal-immigrants-a-boon-to-us-economy-n3798463
LikeLike
except there is no reason to believe that ice is melting on Greenland. Several years ago researchers located an abandoned WWII plane that landed on Greenland’s ice, only they had to dig way down deep into the ice to get it out, given the huge growth of ice
LikeLike
LikeLike
@mrddmia
The Biden White House looks like the Star Wars bar today. With Biden handing out cheap tequila shots (Biden presidential medals) to the Trump-deranged losers.
·
28.3K Views
LikeLike
I have made no posts for or against obtaining Greenland. It does raise questions.
LikeLike
This will make it harder for the Freedom (not) Caucus hostage taking morons to oust Johnson.
“The rules package, which passed in a 215-209 vote, requires nine members of the majority party to co-sponsor a motion to vacate the speaker from the top leadership position, up from current rules that only require one. The change offers some breathing room for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) as he enters his first full term as speaker, especially after he faced initial opposition to secure the gavel earlier in the day. “
LikeLike
Some parts of Greenland seem to be melting, but in any case the technology to recover minerals should allow for more production even with the ice.
LikeLike
There is no doubt some glaciers are retreating in Greenland. The causes and consequences are probably not what the eco-terrorists claim but I have seen film of several glaciers that have retreated several miles in the last 30 years. Now whether this has uncovered any ore deposits I don’t know.
LikeLike
1. What becomes of the Greenlanders? Are they granted immediate American citizenship/dual citizenship? Will it be like Puerto Rico with citizenship but not voting for President or having voting rights in Congress? When does the make Greenland a state movement begin?
2. Will West Side story be updated to reflect 3 gangs – the Jets, the Sharks, and Polar Bears?
LikeLike
cLDaugh
JUST IN: Chuck Schumer proclaims Democrats lost the 2024 election because the American voters “didn’t realize how much we had done” for them.
Rule number 1 in politics: Don’t blame the voters.
LikeLike
There are only 56,000 Greenlanders. They could choose between US citizenship and Danish or keep both.
LikeLike
Schumer was wrong, as the voters did realize how much “damage” the Dems had done for this country and it’s people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Schumer must subscribe to the Bunu school of politics.
If it wasn’t for those pesky voters, his candidates would always win.
LikeLike
The free passers will soon turn on the grifter.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/zelenskyy-says-trump-could-decisive-bringing-end-war
LikeLike
6.2 earthquake just struck 30 miles or so from El Salvador.
LikeLike
The reaction of the Not One Square Inch crowd will be interesting, if Big Z/Ukraine decides to cede territory in order to end the war.
Chicon
LikeLike
LikeLike
It will be a worse deal for the grifter than the deal blown up by the fat slob.
LikeLike
There was no “deal”, only a demand that Ukraine surrender its sovereignty, rightfully rejected.
Repeating the lie over and over might make Goebbels proud, but it’s still BS.
LikeLike
The reaction of the Not One Square Inch crowd will be interesting”
Can we have the name of anyone here who ever said Not One Square Inch?
If not we will just credit you for the 2025 HHR Clown Contest.
LikeLike
The “peace agreement” that was not for peace and not an agreement.
“One of the many myths and legends surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine is the idea that Kyiv rejected a reasonable Russian peace deal in the early weeks of the war. In reality, recently obtained documents confirm that the terms offered by the Kremlin in spring 2022 would have left Ukraine partitioned, disarmed, internationally isolated, and utterly unable to defend itself against further Russian aggression. In other words, Vladimir Putin’s alleged peace proposal was in fact a call for unconditional surrender and a blueprint for the destruction of the Ukrainian state.
Documents released this week by Radio Free Europe provide important new insights into the severity of the Kremlin’s demands when Russian and Ukrainian delegations sat down at the negotiating table in the first weeks of the war. As Putin’s armies swept across southern Ukraine and advanced on Kyiv, Russian officials listed their conditions to halt the invasion and implement a ceasefire. The resulting draft treaty spells out the unacceptable costs of what would have amounted to Ukraine’s capitulation.
In terms of territorial concessions, Ukraine was expected to cede Crimea and the Donbas region outright, while also accepting the ongoing occupation of areas then under Russian control until Moscow deemed that its conditions had been fully met. Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.
The most detailed and revealing segment of the draft peace treaty dealt with Ukraine’s demilitarization. Russia called for the Ukrainian army to be drastically reduced to a skeleton force of just fifty thousand personnel. This was approximately one-fifth of the prewar total and a tiny fraction of Ukraine’s current military, which is believed to number around one million soldiers. Meanwhile, tight restrictions were to be imposed on the quantity of armor Ukraine could possess, the types of missiles the country could develop, and the size of the Ukrainian Air Force.
The Kremlin’s peace plan also obliged Ukraine to renounce its NATO membership ambitions and agree not to enter into bilateral alliances or seek military aid from Western countries. In later drafts dating from the final stages of the abortive peace process in April 2022, Russia also somewhat absurdly insisted on a veto over any international response to future attacks on Ukraine. If Ukraine’s leaders had accepted Moscow’s thinly veiled ultimatum, the country would have been disarmed and defenseless.”
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putins-2022-peace-proposal-was-a-blueprint-for-the-destruction-of-ukraine/
LikeLike
Had Ukraine and the West accepted those terms, Ukraine would have instantly been rendered defenseless and become a vassal state of Russia.
LikeLike
I had as one of my 2025 predictions, that U.SD, gets Greenland.
LikeLike
“Sonny” Smart, father of Georgia head coach Kirby Smart, dies in fall in New Orleans
Sean Leahy
January 4, 2025 at 11:10 AM
*****************************
ssq texted me.
She sees a conspiracy here.
If he died in the fall,. why are they just getting around to tell us now in the middle of winter.
LikeLike
The Ukrainian people have been tired of the war for some time. Zelensky has also become less popular because of the war, and he is now looking at Trump’s “unpredictability” to end the war. Of course a wave of disappointment will erupt here for two guys, who only want what they want before any talk of ending the war is discussed.
LikeLike
Harry Sisson
@harryjsisson
Things have gotten WAY WORSE since Trump got elected!!!”
LOL
WHo is still President?
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzz Ukraine has the right to fight as long as it can and it is in the strategic interest of the U.S. to aid it. As a sovereign nation, it will have to make its decision.
The Putin supporters wanted Ukraine to surrender its sovereignty and become a puppet of Russia.
LikeLike
Lies. Damn lies. More lies.
LikeLike
Reading the alleged agreement terms offered years ago to resolving the Ukraine/Russian conflict quickly, how and what does Ukraine gain by waiting two years and doing it in 2025?
LikeLike
The Ukrainian people have been tired of the war for some time.”
I guess they are tired of having their people displaced, killed, tortured, maimed, kidnapped and exiled and their towns and cities bombed and their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure destroyed and their economy ruined.
But Chicon, Tina, Janzam, and the rest of the Putinistas are still cheering their hero Putin on and making excuses for his war crimes.
LikeLike
TReading the alleged agreement terms offered years ago to resolving the Ukraine/Russian conflict quickly, how and what does Ukraine gain by waiting two years and doing it in 2025?
Zzzzz…
Those will not be the terms, Ukraine will be MORE heavily armed, not less. European troops will be placed in Ukraine to ensure whatever new borders there will be. Ukraine will not be forced to disarm and will not surrender its sovereignty.
Even more importantly, NONE of this will happen.
Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.
LikeLike
Jason says…..”I guess they are tired of having their people displaced, killed, tortured, maimed, kidnapped and exiled and their towns and cities bombed and their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure destroyed and their economy ruined.”
Exactly.
And, as a result, they may decide to cut the best deal they can. Then, you and Bitter will whine like tired three yeat olds about how it’s Trump’s fault.
Chicon
LikeLike
I think sacrificing tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, lives, wiping complete communities off the map, causing millions to flee their country and tearing apart families is the sad legacy of this unnecessary war. Putin is certainly the villain. But, those defiantly denying reality, seeing Ukraine winning back its original borders, are fools.
LikeLike
Ukraine is still a sovereign nation. Next question.
LikeLike
Zzzzzz It will be Putin’s fault.
LikeLike
The war was only unnecessary for Russia. Once invaded, it was absolutely necessary for Ukraine to fight back.
LikeLike
Jan – Should Ukraine have accepted the terms outlined by Radio Free Europe?
LikeLike
Why privately? State it publicly, buffune
REPORT: Senate Majority Leader John Thune privately confirms Pete Hegseth has the votes to be confirmed as Secretary of Defense – CBS
LikeLike
Sad but true.
“And, as a result, they may decide to cut the best deal they can. Then, you and Bitter will whine like tired three yeat olds about how it’s Trump’s fault.”
LikeLike
Putina still believes there was a pre-war deal. Sad but true. Jason posted Putin’s surrender offer.
LikeLike
If Trump doesn’t stand up for Ukraine’s sovereignty, it will be on him.
But I have a feeling the Putinistas are going to be disappointed.
LikeLike
of this unnecessary war.”
The war was only unnecessary up to the point the Russians invaded.
After that, it was entirely “necessary”.
LikeLike
Jan – Should Ukraine have accepted the terms outlined by Radio Free Europe?
Weighing the consequences of not signing it, I think the deal would have been better than what they will get now. Does anyone think Putin will negotiate better terms now, after losing so many men, than what he was willing to do before all the bloodshed?
LikeLike
Vance and Don Jr. are pro-Putin and of course have a lot of influence with Trump. But he has some advisors who have previously expressed support for Ukraine and Rubio himself as SOS is no isolationist. In fact, one of the reasons I supported him for President is that I do think he understands geopolitics and is supportive of our alliances and strategic interests.
Maybe I am wrong, but I think Trump will play more hardball with Putin than the Putinistas hope for.
LikeLike
Weighing the consequences of not signing it, I think the deal would have been better than what they will get now”
Geezus, you are one stupid Putin toady.
The “deal”: was unilateral surrender by Ukraine, militarily and culturally too. It would have ended as a sovereign nation.
The most detailed and revealing segment of the draft peace treaty dealt with Ukraine’s demilitarization. Russia called for the Ukrainian army to be drastically reduced to a skeleton force of just fifty thousand personnel. This was approximately one-fifth of the prewar total and a tiny fraction of Ukraine’s current military, which is believed to number around one million soldiers.
Kyiv would also have been forced to grant Russian the status of official state language and adopt a range of laws targeting Ukrainian religion, history, and national identity that harked back the russification policies of the Soviet and Tsarist empires.
Ukraine’s leaders had accepted Moscow’s thinly veiled ultimatum, the country would have been disarmed and defenseless.“
You really agree Ukraine should have agreed to this?
LikeLike
oes anyone think Putin will negotiate better terms now, after losing so many men, than what he was willing to do before all the bloodshed?”
Of course he will.y
He is not going to get ANY of that.
Ukraine is not going to de-militarize, any deal now will involve strengthening Ukraine’s military and placing foreign troops to ensure Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
And there is not going to be any “Russification” of Ukraine, quite to the contrary.
LikeLike
The deal will be worse than the pre war one.
The free passers will blame trump when the grifter signs the “new peace deal.”
LikeLike
Gee how did they enter?
House Intel Chair Mike Turner Confirms ISIS-Linked Terrorists Actively
LikeLike
Tina said…..”The deal will be worse than the pre war one.
The free passers will blame trump when the grifter signs the “new peace deal.”
I think the first is not true, and the second is absolutely true (more so for Bitter than Jason).
Trump will not allow what looks like a loss (to most people) on his record. He wants to say…”the invasion wouldn’t have happened if i was President, and I got a good deal once I returned”. I also think Pooty Poot and Big Z want an escape hatch, and Trump will provide it.
Bitter will rail against the deal almost no matter what it entails; Jason will be considerably more realistic, imo.
Chicon
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Fair enough about disagreeing with point 1 and agreeing (for the most part) on point 2
LikeLike
(chicon)
LikeLike
I remember when Chi supported Ukraine defending itself. Of course, the Cult demands obedience.
LikeLike
There was never a deal. Tina will continue to lie. Both can be true.
LikeLike
Tina said…..”The deal will be worse than the pre war one.”
I posted what that “deal” (it was not a deal, it was a demand) entailed, but Tina the Putinista pretends that a pending agreement would be “worse than that”.
You can’t really deal with that kind of ignorance.
LikeLike
I guess Tina thinks that allowing Putin to decide the size of Ukraine’s military and Ukrainian children being instructed only in Russia was a deal.
LikeLike
Bitter will rail against the deal almost no matter what it entails; Jason will be considerably more realistic, imo.”
Bitter and I have a few disagreements on Ukraine, he thinks Putin would have invaded even if Trump won in 2020, I would bet big $$$ against it. He is also more pessimistic than I am on how bad Trump’s proposal to end the war will be.
But I think we are in agreement that in a just and fair world, the US would provide whatever aid was required for Ukraine to expel the Russians, make the Russians pay reparations, and bring to justice the war criminals.
Anything less that that is morally wrong.
I am only a “realist” about it because it is not a just a fair world.
LikeLike
I have a feeling that since Tina is a compulsive liar she will say any deal that is reached “is worse” than her imaginary deal.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Tom Tradup at Townhall demolishes hostage taking moron Thomas Massie…ouch.
“First up at bat on Friday was the comical U.S. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) who clearly has no future with California Psychics.com (the website that boasts it turns down 98% of the psychics who apply for work because of their dubious ability to make accurate predictions.)
Massie—the linear equivalent of Mayberry deputy Barney Fife, who was only issued one bullet on the 1960 TV series “The Andy Griffith Show”—apparently believed he was going to derail U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson’s re-election to a second term as Speaker on the worst domino-theory since the Vietnam War. The Kentucky firebrand—quite likely the biggest blowhard in Congress since former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh—seemed to believe something like this: “If I bellow that I won’t vote for Mike Johnson even if they (?) shove bamboo splints under my fingernails, others will fall in line and join me in my personal vendetta against the Speaker.”
Before the vote took place, Massie must have been watching old films of The Three Stooges, like to one where their Army sergeant asks his troops for three volunteers to take on a dangerous assignment; everyone else takes a few steps back…and Curly, Larry and Moe are left to face the music. (I’m not comparing the brief “dissent” on Friday to the Stooges…particularly because Moe sports a snappier haircut that Thomas Massie.”
LikeLike
particularly because Moe sports a snappier haircut that Thomas Massie”
Damm….
LikeLike
Tina and Jan probably think Hitler offered Poland a deal, too.
LikeLike
Breaking: Fidel Castros son will resign as Canadian Pm.
LikeLike
NT
LikeLike