Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 41.6 / 55.6 | -14.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 45.5 / 52.1 | -6.6 |
 | GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +21 | 207 | 228 |
Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 41.6 / 55.6 | -14.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 45.5 / 52.1 | -6.6 |
| GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +21 | 207 | 228 |
The Hedgehog Report - Phoenix Edition 
34 responses to “Overnight thread until DW posts in the morning.”
Frist!
LikeLike
GFY
LikeLike
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1881893718716010620?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1881893718716010620%7Ctwgr%5E1bc732e95396ad61613259b047dffb2e84766737%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Finstapundit.com%2F697778%2F
-This seems useful.
Pretty sure that we are approaching the day when we really find out who likes BIG GOVERNMENT and who doesn’t.
LikeLike
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1869775035940130962
-I like this person.
LikeLike
From previous thread:
“NYC, I’d say the “students” who interrupted the class became trespassers in that moment. The precedent for trespassing in a political protest is several years in jail, after a couple years in the joint before being charged. Lock them up!
Chicon”
-Chicon,
Probably why they tested out their MO at Columbia in NYC…..they know they won’t be arrested by the Soros-funded Bragg.
LikeLike
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/01/trump-revokes-birthright-citizenship.php
-“Personally, I hope they decide it means that illegal aliens can’t, by breaking our laws, create new American citizens.”
Piece by John Hinderaker
Pretty much explains what I believe.
One caveat: ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS, and make sure the border is shut and patrolled diligently.
LikeLike
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/01/caution-knuckleheads-at-work.php
-Walz’s Minnesota!
NYC looks civilized comparatively.
LikeLike
Cheers, and Goodnight!
LikeLike
https://americanmind.org/salvo/birthright-citizenship-game-on/
“Claremont scholars have made the argument in books, law review articles, congressional testimony, and legal briefs. President Ronald Reagan’s Attorney General, Edwin Meese, even joined one of those briefs, in which we argued against treating enemy combatant Yaser Esam Hamdi as a citizen merely because he had been born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, while his father was working in the U.S. on a temporary work visa. Perhaps as a result of our brief in that case, the late Justice Antonin Scalia referred to Hamdi as a “presumed citizen” in his dissenting opinion.”
-Jason and Bitterlaw are on Hamdi’s side.
Only a “racist xenophobe” could disagree…..
LikeLike
Then amend the Constitution regarding citizenship. Don’t be like Democrats who want to use EOs and 5 SCOTUS justices to get around the Constitution.
LikeLike
It’s going to be a tough 4 years over at DKos…
‘If you’re arguing she was fired for being female and/or for pushing a DEI agenda, you’re playing into MAGA hands.
She was fired for being loyal to the Constitution and for being perceived as a Biden-loyalist. In other words, she was perceived as being someone difficult as would not be a ‘yes-man,’ someone who would readily say no and take no action to conduct illegal orders. She was fired as part of a coup. She was fired in a move to make our own Gestapo.”
LikeLike
Jason and Bitterlaw are on Hamdi’s side.”
No, I recognize him as a legitimate US citizen according to the Constitution.
As such, go ahead and execute him as a traitor.
LikeLike
Jason and Bitterlaw are on Hamdi’s side.”
No, I recognize him as a legitimate US citizen according to the Constitution.
As such, go ahead and execute him as a traitor.
LikeLike
Then amend the Constitution regarding citizenship. Don’t be like Democrats who want to use EOs and 5 SCOTUS justices to get around the Constitution”
They don’t care about the Constitution just like they really don’t care about the weaponization of government.
The ends justify the means. They are just like the Democrats.
LikeLike
I thought it was up to the Supreme Court to interpret the language of the constitution? Turns out Bitter thinks this is not the case. He continues his unhinged posts.
Chicon
LikeLike
Perhaps Bitter can explain the holding in Marbury v. Madison, and whether it is consistent with his statement about using “5 SCOTUS justices to get around the Constitution.”
Chicon
LikeLike
Unhinged posts
The Cult can’t handle anybody who dares to disagree.
The Supreme Court will interpret the 14th Amendment and rule 9-0 against Trump on this.
LikeLike
The SC court’s position is established. It could be changed. I doubt it will. An EO is not the way to do it.
All can be true.
The SC could rule for a different interpretation. A constitutional amendment could be passed.
Until then birthright citizenship is the law of the land according to the Constitution and its interpretation to date.
Hopefully, the courts will see it that way and slap down Trump’s EO ASAP.
LikeLike
The Cult is afraid of the Amendment process so they support the Democrat strategy of EOs and getting 5 justices on their side.
LikeLike
Bitter says….The Supreme Court will interpret the 14th Amendment and rule 9-0 against Trump on this.
Great, then it will be settled. And if they agree with him 6-3, you said that means Trump would have used them to go around the Constitution. So, yes, unhinged.
Chicon
LikeLike
The Supreme Court will interpret the 14th Amendment and rule 9-0 against Trump on this”
And when it does it will be fun to watch the hate posts against the “RINO traitors” and “beotches” on the SC.
LikeLike
Great, then it will be settled.”
Zzzzz… it is settled now.
Anyone who was born in the US since 1868 is an American, and as much of an American as any racist xenophobe also born in the US.
Want to change it? Amend the Constitution, or get the SC to agree to a narrower interpretation.
Meanwhile, slap down this unconstitutional EO.
LikeLike
Maybe Jason can cite the Supreme Court case that says “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is applied to a child born to people in the US illegally. ?
Chicon
LikeLike
Where is your law degree from?
LikeLike
Great, then it will be settled.
No. The Cult will just keep trying. Why are you afraid to amend the Constitution?
LikeLike
Yes finally our military doing something here and not in Krapistan.
LikeLike
CLOSED BORDER: DOJ memo citing the supremacy clause says the department is going after sanctuary cities to require state & local actors to comply or face ARREST by FOR OBSTRUCTION.
LikeLike
Bitter says…Where is your law degree from?
Bitter gets childish when he’s called out on his ridiculous legal statements.
Bitter, tell us about the meaning of Marbury and how it meshes with your statement about using 5 Justices to get around the constitution….
Chicon
LikeLike
Zzzzzz. When you tell me where you received your legal training, we can discuss the law.
You are like the Democrats who decided it was easier to get SCOTUS to invent the right to abortion in Roe rather than changing the law in 50 states or amending the Constitution.
LikeLike
Maybe Jason can cite the Supreme Court case that says “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is applied to a child born to people in the US illegally”
Zzzzz….maybe you can cite the case where the SC ever said children of illegal immigrants born in the US are not American.
LikeLike
Why are you afraid to amend the Constitution?”
Because they know it won’t pass. So they go the EO route to pretend this is not established in the Constitution and the law of the land.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Jason said….maybe you can cite the case where the SC ever said children of illegal immigrants born in the US are not American.
There isn’t one. That’s the point, Chief. Don’t tell Bitter, but one major role of the Court is to decide whether actions of the Legislative and Executive branches violate the Constitution.
In this case, the Court will need to interpret the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language in the 14th Amendment.
Chicon
LikeLike
New Thread
LikeLike