Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 42.0 / 55.1 | -13.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 46.2 / 51.0 | -4.8 |
 | GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +3 | 216 | 219 |
Trump Job Approval
| Pollsters wrong in 2024: | 42.0 / 55.1 | -13.0 |
| Pollsters right in 2024: | 46.2 / 51.0 | -4.8 |
| GOP | DEM |
| Democrats +3 | 216 | 219 |
The Hedgehog Report - Phoenix Edition 
26 responses to “Reset for overnight shift.”
uno
LikeLike
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
·
15m
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Democrats APPEAL the PA Supreme Court decision that just ordered the halting of counting illegal ballots.
The effort to steal the election from Dave McCormick (R) continues.
Quote
Democracy Docket
@DemocracyDocket
·
1h
NEW: The Casey campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee file a lawsuit challenging the rejection of 2,000+ provisional ballots in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania with signature or envelope issues. More litigation is expected. https://democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-philadelphia-county-provisional-ballot-signature-and-envelope-error-challenge/
LikeLike
no wonder they are appealing. The ruling today would wipe out 2000 Casey ballots just in Philly.
LikeLike
if you are NOT competent to follow directions, then don’t vote by mail. Show up on election day, and fill out the ballot, and push it through the scanner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So with the example of the Dems counting illegal votes in PA, this is an example of why so many people say there is a threat to democracy.
But the threat to rule of law, the constitution and democracy itself comes from the DEMS.
++++
Was there every any polling done BEFORE THE ELECTION to separate out the part of there 26% or whatever of Americans who felt there “was a threat to democracy” as to how many felt the threat was coming from the DEMs and how many felt it was coming from the Trump side?
LikeLike
Zzzzzzzzz I told you they would try that at the end of the last thread.
LikeLike
Sorry. I did not read the article first. I thought they wanted to go the Feds.
LikeLike
Shapiro throws the county commissioners under the bus.
The Department of State had advised counties repeatedly of their duty to segregate challenged provisional ballots and undated ballots in anticipation of a ruling by the court,” Mr. Shapiro said. “The court has now ruled on the counting of these ballots specific to the Nov. 5, 2024, election, and I expect all county election officials to adhere to this ruling and all the applicable laws governing our elections.”
LikeLike
He added that “any insinuation that our laws can be ignored or do not matter is irresponsible and does damage to faith in our electoral process.”
LikeLike
There is more. Throwing out these ballots statewide increases the margin to more than what triggers a recount.
LikeLike
The margin would go up to almost 24,000.
LikeLike
Justice P. Kevin Brobson wrote in a concurring opinon that he wanted “to disabuse local elections officials of the notion that they have the authority to ignore Election Code provisions that they believe are unconstitutional.”
LikeLike
and its not just this PA Senate race. Invalid ballots skew the results of Trump’s PA margin and other statewide races
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only downside is that this allows Shapiro to add to his fake moderate image.
LikeLike
sadly. People will fall for it though we all know he’s support the steal if he could get away with it
LikeLike
Casey probably thought the Dems on the Supreme Court would do his bidding. Like I said, don’t tell a court GFY.
LikeLike
agreed Bitter. So now he throws someone else under the bus to play Mr Election Integrity because the election in 2028 is more important to him than helping Casey retain his seat
true hypocrite
LikeLike
sorry. I was referring to Shapiro
Casey thought he was entitled to those votes because of his family name.
LikeLike
Scary that 3 of the hacks on the PA SC dissented. What was there to dissent?
I actually read the dissent. It stated that the lower courts should handle it first. I guess the reasoning was that by then maybe Casey could be declared the winner.
LikeLike
That’s the problem I have with Liberals on the court, goes especially for the SC. You will know how Liberals vote in 99.5% of all cases without even hearing them. I don’t even know why they sit in on oral arguments sometimes. They will always toe the party line. Republicans are the wild card
LikeLike
Right. It should have been a 7-0 vote. The ruling had already been made. Some county boards tried to ignore it.
Why would you vote against enforcing you own ruling. Even if you disagreed with the original ruling, you should be concerned about the preserving the legitimacy of the court.
LikeLiked by 1 person
stare decisis only if we agree
LikeLike
F”ck BL
F”ck Jason
LikeLike
Hey amoral wuss
LikeLike
Damn. I hate sharing points.
LikeLike
NT
LikeLike